Public/Private Ventures
45
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: Philadelphia, PA
Founded: 1978
Mission: Public/Private Ventures is a national nonprofit organization whose mission is to improve the effectiveness of social policies, programs and community initiatives, especially as they affect youth and young adults. In carrying out this mission, P/PV works with philanthropies, the public and business sectors, and nonprofit organizations.
Tags:
national, workforce development, research, resource services, technical assistance, policy, program development, program evaluation
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Nadya Shmavonian.
Ms. Shmavonian began her tenure as President of Public/Private Ventures in January 2010. Prior to joining P/PV, she worked as an independent consultant, providing strategic direction and counsel to many private foundations and a broad array of local, national and international nonprofit organizations. She has extensive foundation management experience, most recently having served as vice president for strategy at the…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
n/a
Total Revenue:
$9,705,978
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Website:
E-Mail:
webmaster AT ppv.org
Phone:
215-557-4400
Address:
2000 Market St.Ste 600
Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA
Story:
In 1978, P/PV was created by the Ford Foundation and the US Department of Labor to bring together the government, business, and nonprofit sectors to address the needs of disadvantaged young people. The organization's initial work focused on evaluating and creating strategies to connect these youth to education and jobs. Its work now focuses on a wide range of social issues, including community health, youth development, faith-based initiatives, sectoral employment, mentoring, after-school programs, youth violence, and prisoner reentry. (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public/Private_Ventures)
Expert Reviews of Public/Private Ventures
Evidence of Impact Summary:
Public Private Ventures is heralded for their research, evaluation, training, and policy advocacy within the workforce development field. Their research has compelled other organizations to be more efficient and more impactful in their practices and programming.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
They receive praise for the quality of their research as well as the efficacy of their communications and advocacy.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Experts cited differing opportunities for improvement including program integration, evaluation methods, and marketing.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Impact |
|||
|
F
|
They have improved the outcomes of workforce practitioners based on their evidence of what works. | ||
|
F
|
I find their research to be very useful in identifying best practices. I also really like the benchmarking project. | ||
|
N
|
This is a national organization that is dedicated to providing training, policy analysis, and by doing so, helps assist in raising the standards for workforce professionals, and enhancing best practices. | ||
|
N
|
They do outstanding work (Job Training That Works: Findings from the Sectoral Employment Impact Study) evaluating the impact of sectoral training initiatives as a pathway for low-income adults. Their work has shaped program development and state and federal policy. It is regularly referenced by White House domestic policy staff. | ||
|
N
|
They offer good data with stories to back up findings. | ||
|
O
|
They have conducted and published results the random assignment evaluation of sectoral workforce development programs that demonstrate effectiveness. Their training and technical assistance for the field are also signs of impact. | ||
|
O
|
They have created a body of knowledge about effective approaches to securing employment for low income/other vulnerable populations. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Staff & Marketing |
|||
|
F
|
They have a very experienced staff, well financed organization, marketing, and their publication materials are impressive. | ||
Staff |
|||
|
F
|
I think the staff there is strong and the quality of their work is strong. | ||
Research |
|||
|
N
|
Their research on best practices is unparalleled. | ||
|
N
|
They provide relevant information about timely issues. | ||
|
N
|
They provide invaluable research and focus on workforce issues. | ||
Evaluation |
|||
|
N
|
They have a strong focus on evaluation and replication as well as a strong, knowledgeable, and experienced staff. | ||
Communications & Advocacy |
|||
|
O
|
They have a strong communications arm that is good at communicating lessons learned about workforce development via research to the field, policymakers, and the public at large. They host some of the best trainings I've been to. | ||
Reputation & Operations |
|||
|
O
|
Their reputation, reach, and tools/products are strengths. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Program Design |
|||
|
F
|
I would suggest they add to their hands-on consulting experience which we have found very valuable to grantees. | ||
Marketing |
|||
|
N
|
Marketing and communications could be improved. | ||
Integration |
|||
|
O
|
I think that they are working across too many issues areas. Stakeholders tend to know them through the area of work they engage with but don't have a comprehensive picture of what the organization does. | ||
Evaluation |
|||
|
O
|
They should ensure clients employ the strongest (most rigorous) evaluation/assessment models possible given their level of maturity/funding constraints (i.e. don't let clients get away with just descriptive studies if stronger models are available to them). | ||
Leadership
Nadya Shmavonian
President
President
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
