NARAL Pro-Choice America
65
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: Washington, D.C.
Founded: 1969
Mission: NARAL Pro-Choice America's mission is to develop and sustain a constituency that uses the political process to guarantee every woman the right to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices, including preventing unintended pregnancy, bearing healthy children, and choosing legal abortion.
Tags:
national, women's reproductive health, advocacy, policy, reproductive justice, abortion, sex education, pregnancy, contraception
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Nancy Keenan.
As president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, Nancy Keenan is a nationally recognized progressive leader who works in partnership with allies in Washington, D.C. and in the states, as well as the organization’s one-million member activists, to protect the fundamental American values of freedom and privacy. With nearly 20 years of experience as an elected official from Montana, Nancy took the…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
26.01%
Total Revenue:
$4,435,661
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Website:
E-Mail:
membership AT ProChoiceAmerica.org
Phone:
202-973-3000
Story:
You may never have heard of Carrie Baker, but she is the reason many women have access to emergency contraception (EC) at Kroger Co. pharmacies:
In the spring of 2007, Carrie, a mother of two, stepped forward to tell her story. Her local Kroger pharmacy refused to stock EC.
She called NARAL and wanted to take action. They helped Carrie's story garner media attention, including coverage on MSNBC and by the Associated Press. Thousands of activists called on Kroger to make sure all of its stores in 19 states had EC.
The Kroger Co. agreed to require all of its pharmacies to stock emergency contraception. They even provided an "800" number for our activists in case they experienced problems.
Carrie's story is a reminder. One person can make a difference.
(To read other success stories, visit: http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/about-us/successes/)
Expert Reviews of NARAL Pro-Choice America
Evidence of Impact Summary:
Naral Pro-Choice America is cited as the dominant watchdog entity in terms of reproductive rights. Their advocacy efforts receive consistent praise in shaping public policy.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
Their name recognition gets frequent praise from respondents. Experts also mentioned staff and leadership quality as assets.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Opinions on areas for improvement vary by expert but included areas like affiliate support, leadership, funding and advocacy focus.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Impact |
|||
|
F
|
NARAL also has been instrumental in furthering the reproductive justice cause. One example would be in CO for the defeat of Amendment 48 in 2008 and their coalition efforts for 2010. | ||
|
R
|
This is the political arm of the pro-choice movement. | ||
|
R
|
They work extremely well with the Hill, providing talking points and what is needed. | ||
|
N
|
This is one of the major watchdogs for reproductive rights policy issues at the local, state, and national levels. | ||
|
N
|
Their political presence is of great importance regarding candidates, focus on media, and legislative work. They need pro-choice elected officials. | ||
|
N
|
They have been an important advocacy partner for Planned Parenthood, ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights. They worked in states to turn out the pro-choice vote in 2008. | ||
|
N
|
They have the strongest advocacy voice for reproductive rights in the country. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Staff |
|||
|
F
|
Their staff has a high level of caliber and effort. | ||
|
R
|
They have some very experienced staff which is very helpful to policy makers. They are a continued presence to be reckoned with. They stay on top of current events and fight the good fight where they feel it is strategic. | ||
Leadership |
|||
|
R
|
They have strong leadership and staff. | ||
Program Design |
|||
|
N
|
They do lobbying and voter education as well as community education and outreach. | ||
Name Recognition |
|||
|
N
|
Their media presence and vote-counting are strengths. | ||
|
N
|
There is name recognition and strength in New York and San Francisco, which has allowed them to have brand and financial strength. They are "at the table" in Washington DC on all the important issues related to women’s health and supreme court nominees. | ||
|
N
|
They are quoted in news articles and reports when it comes to reproductive rights more often than Planned Parenthood and other organizations in the reproductive health and rights field. | ||
Recruitment & Marketing |
|||
|
O
|
They attract bright young people; they marketed and built their brand well during the Clinton Era. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
More Funding |
|||
|
F
|
Unlimited funding would enable them to further their efforts. | ||
Leadership & Staff |
|||
|
F
|
The word on the street is that it has weak leadership at the staff and board level and has shrunk considerably in recent years. | ||
Impact |
|||
|
F
|
They are not effective anymore; they seem to have lost their compass and the style of leadership/policy positioning is actually damaging to the field. | ||
|
R
|
It is a vital voice for rights but could be more effective. I rarely see it quoted in the press, and many states have no chapter. It needs to expand its grass roots activities to compete with the National Right to Life Committee and others anti-choice groups. | ||
|
N
|
They have had 30 years to improve the political environment; it is now time for a change. | ||
Collaboration & Program Design |
|||
|
R
|
Their affiliates are weak. They do not play nice with others (like Planned Parenthood). They do not have a vision and clarity of purpose or at least one that is clear to the outside world in the reproductive rights community and thus they have undermined their strength greatly. Also, by not having clarity of vision, they are not having the impact on policies affecting reproductive rights they could. | ||
Affiliate Support |
|||
|
N
|
They could do a better job of maintaining and supporting state affiliates (our state affiliate is currently inactive). | ||
More Advocacy |
|||
|
N
|
They need to be stronger in its advocacy and a better coalition partner and leader. | ||
Leadership |
|||
|
N
|
I have been consistently disappointed with Nancy Keenan. For example, she made a strategic mistake when she endorsed Obama before the primaries were over which resulted in alienating many of the Hillary Clinton supporters. There was no need for that early decision when she could have made the endorsement after Hillary conceded to Obama. She also made strategic errors around Justice Sotomayor's nomination. | ||
Diversity |
|||
|
O
|
Along with Planned Parenthood Federation of America, though, this huge organization never ceases to disappoint all but the most mainstream white liberals. Perceived as "professional feminists," they are known to try to co-opt and control their smaller budgeted peers in political situations. For women of color and reproductive justice folks especially, their participation in anything is a red flag. | ||
Leadership
Nancy Keenan
President
President
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

