Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
49
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: Seattle, WA
Founded: 1994
Mission: Guided by the belief that every life has equal value, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation works to help all people lead healthy, productive lives. In developing countries, it focuses on improving people’s health and giving them the chance to lift themselves out of hunger and extreme poverty. In the United States, it seeks to ensure that all people—especially those with the fewest resources—have access to the opportunities they need to succeed in school and life.
Tags:
national, education, grantmaking, college readiness, financial aid, postsecondary success, college graduation, college achievement, education reform, postsecondary access, educational equity, teacher effectiveness, community colleges, charter schools
This nonprofit does not accept donations through organizations like Philanthropedia, only directly from individuals. However, they encourage supporters of their work to donate to their list of education grantees.
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Jeff Raikes.
Jeff Raikes, chief executive officer, leads the foundation's efforts to promote equity for all people around the world. He sets strategic priorities, monitors results, and facilitates relationships with key partners for all three of our program groups. Before joining the foundation, Raikes was a member of Microsoft's senior leadership team, which sets overall strategy and direction for the company. Raikes…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
n/a
Total Revenue:
$3,600,000,000
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
E-Mail:
info AT gatesfoundation.org
Phone:
206-709-3100
Story:
This is the story of Hidalgo Early College High School, one of the Gates Foundation’s education grantees:
Hidalgo Early College High School is one of the schools that proves all students can succeed with the right support. Hidalgo is located in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, one of the poorest places in the United States. More than half the students at Hidalgo have a parent who never finished high school. And yet Hidalgo’s graduation rate is almost 90 percent, more than 10 percentage points higher than the Texas average. How does Hidalgo do it? Part of the answer is that it’s an early college high school, which means students complete high school while taking rigorous college courses. Many of them earn so many credits that they graduate not only with their high school diploma but also with an associate degree.
The early college model works, especially for students who belong to groups that are under-represented at colleges, because it helps them get further, faster—and for less money, which is critically important for low-income students. Hidalgo is one of more than 200 early college high schools created since 2002 with support from the Gates Foundation and other partners.
Bill and Melinda Gates visited Hidalgo in October 2008 to get a better understanding of the school’s success. In meetings with students and teachers, two themes came up over and over again. First, high expectations. All the students Bill and Melinda talked to expected to continue their education after graduation. Second, close relationships between teachers and students. Hidalgo extended the school day by a half hour so it could fit tutoring into the curriculum, and the students thrive on the one-on-one contact with their teachers. One student told Melinda that Hidalgo “is like a second home." (Source: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/annualreport/2008/Pages/united-states-program-highlights.aspx)
Expert Reviews of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Evidence of Impact Summary:
Experts cite the scale and breadth of education programming of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as a sign of impact. Their role in influencing the policy world is repeatedly cited as an indicator if impact as well.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
Almost all respondents considered the scope of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's grant making to support education initiatives as a major strength.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Areas for improvement were mixed across experts. Opportunities mentioned included program focus, collaboration, communications, and turnover.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Impact |
|||
|
F
|
The Early Learning in Washington State initiatives which include Thrive by Five, preparation of children for kindergarten, reduction of family homelessness, and providing greater opportunities for students to graduate from high school and earn a postsecondary (college) degree. | ||
|
R
|
Improved health and educational benefits to low income children world wide is a sign of their impact. | ||
|
R
|
Their access to US Department of Education is a sign of impact. | ||
|
R
|
No matter what you think of contemporary education reform, the Gates Foundation has been the most important (private) engine of it. Charter schools, teacher assessment, school nutrition: name a popular education reform in the Obama/Duncan pantheon and the Gates Foundation is behind it--rhetorically and financially. | ||
|
R
|
They are an international and broad-reaching investment in the education of lower income/poor youth. They also forge linkages between these youth and digital technology. | ||
|
R
|
Tom Vaner Ark was the lead person when in the late 1990's the foundation became interested in high school reform in urban districts. Their strategy was to place their bets on districts with effective leadership and make grants to those districts. Over time, they expanded their own staff to provide both oversight and support which was helpful. However, the turnover of Program Officers as the Foundation staff grew made it more difficult for recipients to have coherent direction. | ||
|
R
|
The lengths districts have gone for their support is an example of their impact. Their presence in nearly all educational conversations from higher education, to school organization, to district management, and to teacher quality is another testament to their impact. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Program Design |
|||
|
F
|
The ability to see the big picture, but select smaller venues for testing ideas to ensure that they gain traction is a strength. Their funding advocacy as well as field building opportunities are assets, too. | ||
Grant making & Leadership |
|||
|
R
|
Their incredible funding base and leadership are strengths. | ||
Grant making & Staff |
|||
|
R
|
Their wealth and staffing are strengths. | ||
Grant making |
|||
|
R
|
Their finances are a major strength. Money talks-especially during tough economic times. | ||
|
R
|
Their generous and strategic funding initiatives are strengths. I particularly approve of their recent interest in community colleges. | ||
|
R
|
Their five year grants and focus on taking effective practice to scale in school districts are strengths. | ||
|
R
|
The overwhelming financial capability that has allowed them to pay for large initiatives as well as buy some of the best intellectual capital in the field is a major strength. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Collaboration |
|||
|
F
|
Partner with small funding groups in states or regions where they are making an impact. | ||
Program Focus |
|||
|
R
|
They could have a greater focus on the brain development of young children and provide funding in each state. | ||
More Risk |
|||
|
R
|
They could take more risks and use less conventions. | ||
Engage critics |
|||
|
R
|
I'd like to see the Foundation engage its critics--e.g., Diane Ravitch--more openly and explicitly. | ||
Communications |
|||
|
R
|
The public needs more "interest-related" stories to help increase their understanding of the importance of education around the world. | ||
Turnover |
|||
|
R
|
As noted above, the turnover in program officers who worked with school districts is a problem. | ||
Mission Focus |
|||
|
R
|
Their leadership seems very fragmented. Their focus and mission is unclear. They haven't actually yielded many positive results yet. | ||
Leadership
Jeff Raikes
CEO
CEO
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

