NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
57
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: New York, NY
Founded: 1940
Mission: The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is America's premier legal organization fighting for racial justice. Through litigation, advocacy and public education, LDF seeks structural changes to expand democracy, eliminate disparities, and achieve racial justice in a society that fulfills the promise of equality for all Americans. LDF also defends the gains and protections won over the past 70 years of civil rights struggle and works to improve the quality and diversity of judicial and executive appointments.
Tags:
capital punishment, jury discrimination, the war on drugs, juvenile justice, abuse of police discretion
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
John Payton.
Within the last year John Payton, the sixth President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, has led the organization’s involvement in five cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Two of those cases, in which LDF was either lead counsel or co-counsel, produced critical victories in the areas of voting rights (Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
28.27%
Total Revenue:
$12,833,824
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Story:
Kenneth Reams’ case epitomizes the injustices associated with the administration of the death penalty in the South. Mr. Reams, who is African-American, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for the killing of a white man during the course of an ATM robbery in Pine Bluff, Arkansas. When Mr. Reams was sentenced to death, he was the youngest person then on Arkansas’ death row.
Mr. Reams’ conviction and sentence were the product of a fatally flawed system – Mr. Reams was represented by an appointed lawyer who did not properly investigate the case, did not retain necessary experts, and did not meaningfully challenge the government’s case against Mr. Reams. The trial prosecutors excluded black prospective jurors on the basis of race and withheld from the defense critical evidence that would have undermined the state’s case. Additionally, Mr. Reams was tried by a judge who was later convicted of a felony and removed from the bench. Not surprisingly, given how the odds were stacked against him, Mr. Reams received the death penalty while his co-defendant – who was the shooter in this case – was allowed to plead guilty in exchange for a life sentence.
This case shows that in the South, the death penalty is not reserved for the “worst of the worst.”
The NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF) began representing Mr. Reams after the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed his conviction and sentence on direct appeal. LDF is working to have his death sentence and conviction thrown out.
Expert Reviews of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Evidence of Impact Summary:
The NAACP’s Legal Defense and Educational Fund has had a long history of providing legal protections to minorities in the criminal justice system. The group has maintained its position as a leader in high impact litigation to remove racially biased legislation and unjust court practices.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
Experts have noted the NAACP’s LDF’s major strengths to be their well-regarded brand name, their high quality staff, and their rich history of successful litigation.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
With more access to funding and resources, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund could make improvements on its staff and services. Other areas of improvement include the quality of leadership and the group’s visibility.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
A Long History of Effective Litigation |
|||
|
O
|
For 40 years or more, LDEF has led the nation's bar in its pursuit of justice for society's most vulnerable. LDEF has spearheaded the litigation in numerous cases decided in the Supreme Court, frequently winning key constitutional protections for those facing execution and long-term prison sentences. LDEF continues this work today, litigating a wide range of criminal-justice issues across the country, from illegal police stops in public housing to unconstitutional and unjust death sentences across the south. LDEF also has a great impact by training attorneys to follow best practices. | ||
|
O
|
LDF has been litigating individual criminal cases with broad-reaching effects since the organization's founding 70 years ago. It is unique in that vein and continues to do very high quality work all around the country on behalf of criminal defendants and prisoners in a range of proceedings. It also does community organizing and policy work. | ||
|
R
|
NAACP-LDF has had major influence on issues of race discrimination and capital punishment. Literally thousands of people have been saved from execution directly or indirectly by the work of LDF, and LDF is primarily responsible for the high impact litigation strategy that ended de jure segregation in education and public education. In my opinion the three most significant U.S. Supreme Court decisions of the 20th Century are Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Furman v. Georgia, and LDF was responsible for two of them. When Congress passed the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act with the intention of accelerating and increasing executions in the U.S., LDF sponsored a summit of the best legal minds in the country to map out and implement litigation strategy to minimize its potentially disastrous impact. | ||
|
N
|
The NAACP-LDF has been at the center of the litigation storm fighting the death penalty since the 1960's; without it much of the Supreme Court success and precedent would not have been accomplished. | ||
Strong National Leader |
|||
|
O
|
LDF has been a source of leadership and innovation in attacking racial bias in the criminal justice system. | ||
|
N
|
LDF is the foremost civil rights law firm in the nation. Their work on felon disenfranchisement and prison-based gerrymandering are frontline fights for democracy. They also consistently work as part of legal teams (with the ACLU and others) that are effective. LDF is not afraid to take a position. If there is any additional capacity, their legal acumen regarding policy would be embraced in every arena. | ||
High-Quality Legal Representation |
|||
|
O
|
LDF is effective in providing the highest quality training and support of lawyers in their direct representation in cases. | ||
Widespread Reach |
|||
|
O
|
One of the many things that makes LDF's criminal justice project so special is that it makes a range of impacts, from litigating individual cases that have a broad impact (e.g. Williams v. Allen, a successful Eleventh Circuit appeal in an Alabama capital case that has set the standard for litigating ineffective assistance of counsel claims in that circuit), to Supreme Court amicus briefs (e.g. a widely praised amicus brief filed in the Maples case that may implicate the right to post-conviction counsel and will be argued later this term), to bringing the post-conviction and habeas communities together for a learning strategy conference that is unparalleled, to producing policy reports that help reframe vital issues for the public and policymakers (e.g. juvenile life without parole). | ||
Raises Public Awareness |
|||
|
N
|
The LDF has a unique ability to generate media attention to highlight criminal justice as a priority issue. | ||
|
O
|
The LDF has had an impact on public education in the issues of race and the criminal justice system and the death penalty. | ||
Successful Reform |
|||
|
N
|
The NAACP has recently prioritized criminal justice reform and has brought on expert staff to ensure their work is relevant and impactful. It has been, and I hope to see it continue. They were instrumental in the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act and continue to work diligently to pass the National Criminal Justice Commission Act. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Well-Known and Respected |
|||
|
O
|
One strength is its history as a leader in this field, making it a known and trusted brand. Another strength is LDEF's staff, who are the cream of the crop academically and in their commitment to social justice. | ||
|
O
|
The leadership and staff are both very strong and the organization has a strong influence on other organizations and is called upon to consult in major criminal cases regularly. | ||
|
N
|
This organization has a strong brand identification given it's historical context. Also, the organization has field capacity in many states around the country. | ||
Great Leadership and Staff |
|||
|
O
|
LDF attracts bright young, committed lawyers as staff attorneys and has an excellent supervisory and management team. | ||
|
R
|
LDF has always enjoyed very strong leadership at all levels of its operation. Thurgood Marshall, Tony Amsterdam, George Kendall, and Richard Burr are examples of the high quality of people LDF is able to attract and retain. In addition to high-impact litigation, LDF's litigation strategy is supplemented by its expertise in community organizing. | ||
|
O
|
The leadership in LDF's criminal justice project (Christina Swarns), and LDF as a whole (including John Payton and Debo Adegbile) is superior, as are the other attorneys working on the project (Johanna Steinberg, Vincent Southerland, Jin Hin Lee). | ||
|
O
|
It has strong leadership. | ||
|
N
|
Expert staff members, coupled with a commitment to eliminate racial disparities in the criminal justice system, have led their efforts to be successful at the local and federal level. | ||
Effective Organization of its Community |
|||
|
O
|
LDF plays a critical role in organizing and leading the capital defense community. The LDF staff is top notch. | ||
Influence Among Professionals |
|||
|
N
|
In addition to its specific impact in this area, it has raised race consciousness among litigators and other criminal justice organizations making it evident that race is the engine that drives most of what is wrong with our current criminal justice system. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Greater Access to Resources and Funding |
|||
|
O
|
LDF needs more attorneys devoted to race and CJ issues. The problem is endemic and in much need of greater resources. With more resources, LDF could co-counsel in more cases of critical local concern and impact. | ||
|
O
|
More 501 (c) (4) money would certainly be helpful in allowing the organization to take its organizing and litigation work to lawmakers who might be able to translate it into legislative reform. | ||
|
O
|
The only way I can think of for LDF to be able to improve would be if they had the resources to add even more top-rate people to their team, so they could work on even more cases and projects. | ||
|
O
|
The criminal justice program is small so it probably could benefit from greater resources and more attorneys. | ||
Stronger Leadership |
|||
|
R
|
In the past, THE leader in death penalty litigation and racial justice in the criminal justice system litigation. Recently, they have backed away from many projects, and rarely take the lead - they follow after others have led. Whether this is the leadership of LDF or the larger NAACP, I do not know. Fifteen years ago this was a wonderful organization. Now, the general leadership is weak on criminal justice issues -- except when the public is behind them. The LEADERSHIP that the NAACP used to show has evaporated. | ||
|
R
|
LDF's leadership on criminal justice seems to be waning in the wake of George Kendalls' departure. I don't know why that is, although there are rumors in the death penalty community of a policy shift away from death penalty litigation. That would be sad if it were true. There are other organizations and programs stepping up in this field, and I don't know if that is responsible for a shift in policy, but the legal leadership on death penalty issues and strategies is not emanating from LDF as it once did. | ||
Expand Its Work |
|||
|
N
|
The NAACP should expand the work they do to include less politically-palatable initiatives that will reduce a great deal of harm to people of color in the U.S. | ||
Higher Visibility |
|||
|
N
|
The organization could be improved by successfully seeking to handle less visible causes in cooperation with smaller strategic venues to enhance its overall visibility. | ||
Leadership
John Payton
President and Director-Counsel
President and Director-Counsel
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

