Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
79
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Located: New York, NY
Founded: 1970
Mission: The Natural Resources Defense Council's purpose is to safeguard the Earth. They work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life and to defend endangered natural places. They seek to establish sustainability and good stewardship of the Earth as central ethical imperatives of human society. NRDC affirms the integral place of human beings in the environment. They strive to protect nature in ways that advance the long-term welfare of present and future generations.
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Frances Beinecke.
Under Frances's leadership, the organization sharply focuses on curbing global warming, developing a clean energy future, reviving the world's oceans, saving endangered wild places, stemming the tide of toxic chemicals and accelerating the greening of China. With Bob Deans, Frances recently co-authored the book Clean Energy Common Sense: An American Call to Action on Global Climate Change, which shows how…
See full bio.
Financial Data
| Read Annual Report | Overhead Ratio: 16.80% |
|
Charity Navigator Rating:
|
Total Revenue: $107,999,911 |
From the Nonprofit
|
Patrick Kiely
Nov 03, 2010 |
Meeting the Climate Challenge in Time At NRDC, tackling climate change is both an urgent and long-term institutional priority. Since NRDC’s founding in 1970, we have built up an unparalleled team of expert advocates focusing on the most significant opportunities… Read More. |
Contact Info
| Website: | http://www.nrdc.org/ | Address: | 40 West 20th Street |
| E-Mail: | nrdcinfo AT nrdc.org | New York, NY 10011, USA | |
| Phone: | 212-727-2700 | ||
| Facebook: |
|
Twitter: |
|
Story:
This is a brief report on the enormous job potential NRDC sees in the clean energy field.
Shifting to clean energy creates another winner; the American worker. Research shows that clean energy and climate legislation could create almost 2 million jobs for Americans- jobs for steelworkers who build wind turbines, construction workers who make buildings more energy efficient, and engineers who design hybrid batteries.
In 2009, NRDC made sure Americans heard the opportunity side of the climate story. Their analysts partnered with leading researches to assess how many clean energy jobs could emerge in each state: 70,000 in Ohio, for instance, and 71,650 in Pennsylvania. In Missouri, their study showed that 25 moderate-scale wind farms could result in 550 permanent construction jobs and $75 million in ongoing economic impact. (Source: http://www.nrdc.org/about/annual/energy.pdf)
Expert Reviews of Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Evidence of Impact Summary:
The NRDC helped list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act. In 2005, NRDC staved off the Bush administration's attempts to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. Read more environmental victories since 1971 at http://www.nrdc.org/about/victories.asp.Organization Strengths Summary:
Climate Change experts believe that the Natural Resources Defense Council has been so effective because of a combination of their science-based, politically-savvy, litigation strategy, their outstanding professional staff, their high quality work, and their respect in the community.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
At the same time, some experts believe that the Natural Resources Defense Council should expand their focus areas to things like carbon rents, economic analysis, E2 and drop their focus on ethanol. Additionally, the NRDC would have a much wider impact if they could make their name more visible to the public. They could do this through grassroots action, well-known spokespeople, corporate sector outreach, global campaigns, etc.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Good Strategy |
|||
|
F
|
They are science based and politically astute. | ||
|
F
|
They are the best at integrating science and policy without seeming to tilt toward corporations (as EDF does) or to tilt toward adversarial advocacy (as Sierra Club does.) | ||
|
F
|
They have great access to policy making officials. | ||
|
F
|
They are outstanding due to their policy development. | ||
|
R
|
They are interested in a tough legislative and legal agenda guided by pragmatism. | ||
|
R
|
They combine practical solutions with legal expertise. | ||
|
R
|
They have a good litigation strategy and an effective, informative blog. | ||
|
R
|
They have a pragmatic, market-based approach combined with aggressive advocacy. | ||
|
N
|
They focus on getting the job done. | ||
|
N
|
They have very good outreach. | ||
|
N
|
They provide practical, technical information to inform/convince decision makers. | ||
|
N
|
They are outstanding because of their ability to leverage membership and constituencies to effect positive ends; they have a rational approach. | ||
|
N
|
They focus on driving intelligent legislative action in the US. | ||
|
N
|
They are positioned to have deep impact on Hill debates and are effective inside and outside. | ||
|
N
|
They have an effective strategy and deep expertise. | ||
|
N
|
This organization combines insider advocacy efforts with litigation and public campaigns. | ||
|
O
|
They do ‘smart policy.’ | ||
|
O
|
Through their sponsorship of E2, they are putting a business face on the environmental movement. | ||
|
O
|
They are outstanding because they host E2 to create a business face to the environmental movement. | ||
|
O
|
They have sheer dominance in affecting political debate and working with politicians and administration officials. | ||
High Quality Work |
|||
|
F
|
They do strong policy work and lobbying. | ||
|
F
|
They perform great analysis and are policy-savvy. | ||
|
F
|
I have participated in Environmental Entrepreneurs, and NRDC gets results based on solid data and terrific staff. | ||
|
F
|
They have very strong analytics. | ||
|
F
|
They are technically very strong and have an excellent federal and international presence. | ||
|
R
|
They have effectively litigated several key cases, have an excellent legal team, and do a great job with their outreach and blogs. | ||
|
N
|
They do good legal work. | ||
|
N
|
They do consistent, solid work in this field. | ||
|
N
|
They have good research capability and credibility. | ||
|
N
|
They provide in-depth technical analysis to decision-makers to advocate for efficiency standards and other interventions that are grounded in science and technical analysis. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC is outstanding because of its strong, professional policy work and leadership. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC bases its work on sound science, effective analysis of economics, and effective lobbying. Their E2 subgroup helped pass the Pavley Bill in California, which Washington finally acknowledged with the new Obama Administration. | ||
|
O
|
They offer thorough, flexible, and accessible timely analyses. | ||
Top Experts |
|||
|
R
|
They have an outstanding professional staff. | ||
|
R
|
They have a multi-disciplinary staff, sharply focused advocacy in all arenas (courts, legislature, agencies, international bodies), and a proven track record of accomplishment over a long period on many issues. | ||
|
R
|
They have a superb understanding of environmental law and its use in affecting change. | ||
|
R
|
This organization has first-rate people. | ||
|
N
|
David Hawkins is brilliant. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC has world-class expertise in a balance of advocacy and science. | ||
|
N
|
They are top experts, have a broad set of tools, and are a leader in the community. | ||
|
N
|
They have high quality staff and a broad and deep presence at state and federal level. | ||
|
N
|
They have high quality, knowledgeable advocates. | ||
|
N
|
They have deep scientific knowledge, effective legislation drafting, an excellent lobbying track record, and good outreach to the public. | ||
|
N
|
They have excellent staff and leadership, knowledge of the topic, and the ability to communicate effectively with multiple audiences. | ||
|
N
|
They have a high level of competence, act at multiple levels, and are well connected. | ||
|
N
|
They have a driven, professional staff that gets things done. They are in the trenches, day in and day out. They get the facts right and are always strategic. | ||
|
N
|
They are outstanding with their smart analysts and strong advocacy muscle. | ||
|
N
|
They are very knowledgeable; David Hawkins is brilliant. | ||
|
N
|
They are among the most pragmatic and thoughtful of the big national organizations. | ||
|
O
|
They have a very strong team. | ||
Well Respected |
|||
|
R
|
This organization is outstanding because of its a combination of scientific and legal human resources, access to political leadership, longstanding reputation, and proven record of achievements. | ||
|
N
|
They have connections, respect, and smarts. | ||
|
O
|
NRDC is one of the most highly regarded NGOs in the US. | ||
Advocacy |
|||
|
N
|
This is the best advocacy organization. | ||
|
N
|
They are effective insider advocates. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC brings expertise and focused advocacy to the climate crisis and helps drive needed action. | ||
Collaborate |
|||
|
N
|
NRDC helps to build momentum on the federal side; it is a good collaborator. | ||
|
O
|
They work with the grassroots, media, and the congressional sector. | ||
|
O
|
They are an outstanding organization due to their professional staff, high quality work, ability to work well with other groups (generally), good voice with Congress, and respect from the pubic. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Expand Area of Focus |
|||
|
F
|
They should further ramp up E2. | ||
|
F
|
They should look at carbon rents. | ||
|
R
|
They should come out strongly against the Clean Air Act preemption - it is being too middle-of-the-road regarding the climate change bill. | ||
|
R
|
They should increase their focus on economic analyses. | ||
|
N
|
Don't rush into deals with utilities! | ||
|
O
|
They should drop their interest in ethanol, a losing technology. | ||
Reach Out to a Broader Base |
|||
|
F
|
They should get a few visible, attractive, articulate spokesmen (on the order of Bill Moyers) to promote both the brand and NRDC policies. | ||
|
F
|
They need to balance policy-driven work with a connection to affected communities. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC should become more engaged in state advocacy. | ||
|
N
|
They should develop a global reach. | ||
|
N
|
The NRDC should publicize its cases to the general public. | ||
|
N
|
They should improve their grassroots clout. | ||
|
N
|
They should increase their link to public action. | ||
|
O
|
They could use some new experts in the climate change area and not use the same people for all the different policy topics. | ||
|
O
|
They should increase their corporate sector outreach. | ||
Internal Improvements |
|||
|
N
|
They should be okay being critical if legislation goes bad. | ||
|
N
|
They should not follow the Environmental Defense Fund’s lead in capitulating to win political support. Rather, they should create the evidence base to support a stronger outcome. | ||
|
N
|
They could improve their internal management. | ||
|
O
|
They should improve their campaign staff. | ||
Leadership
Frances Beinecke
President
President
From the Nonprofit
|
Patrick Kiely
Nov 03, 2010 |
Meeting the Climate Challenge in Time
At NRDC, tackling climate change is both an urgent and long-term institutional priority. Since NRDC’s founding in 1970, we have built up an unparalleled team of expert advocates focusing on the most significant opportunities and policy venues for advancing clean energy solutions and reducing the pollution that endangers our health and climate. When it comes to climate change, our challenge is to “bend the curve” in time. We must accelerate the progress underway at the state, regional and federal level and internationally, if we are to reduce emissions fast enough to avoid locking ourselves and future generations into a dangerously disrupted climate. While we have suffered some disappointing setbacks in 2010, especially in the U.S. Senate, the environmental community and our growing ranks of allies must continue to press forward on multiple fronts to build the foundation for a truly low-carbon and cleaner energy economy, and ensure that it grows at a pace that results in the emission reductions that are needed. Much of this work will take place outside of Washington, at the local, state and regional level, and in key developing countries, such as China, where it is critical to build the market and regulatory infrastructure needed to steer economic growth toward cleaner energy resources. As we look ahead to next year and the coming decade, it is helpful to take stock of what we have achieved and are well positioned to build on. These accomplishments, of course, were collaborative efforts involving the hard work of multiple organizations, many of whom are recognized on this website. Key accomplishments include:
The World Resources Institute has analyzed the emission reduction potential under existing federal authority, including the Clean Air Act, and previously announced state actions. While the analysis shows that it is feasible to achieve a 12% reduction by 2020, it does not take into consideration additional state and federal policies (the impacts from utility decoupling, for example) that could result in even greater reductions. Moving forward, NRDC will be focused on two overarching goals: accelerating investment in efficiency and low-carbon energy sources, and improving the political environment that has limited progress towards comprehensive solutions at the federal and international level. Through legal and policy advocacy at the state and federal level, our priority objectives are to: 1.Advance, defend and enforce pollution-reducing standards under current law—for greenhouse gas emissions, as well as conventional pollutants—and clean up or replace dirty power plants and industrial sources with cleaner technologies; 2.Reform electric and gas utility markets to make investments in energy efficiency and clean energy resources a more profitable alternative to high emission and resource intensive power generation; 3.Ensure that state and regional programs to limit greenhouse gas emissions become good working models for transitioning to a clean energy economy while lowering energy bills and creating high quality jobs; and, 4.Pursue select opportunities at the federal level to establish performance-based standards and incentives to accelerate deployment of efficient, low-carbon technologies in the transportation, power and industrial sectors. Success on these fronts will help ensure we have the advanced technologies and regulatory tools in place to get the U.S. on track in the near term. In the longer term, however, we will need national legislation to establish the broad market conditions that will accelerate the deployment of these technologies at the scale and pace that are needed to achieve our emission reduction goals. It is imperative therefore that we use each and every near-term opportunity to improve the political conditions—privately and publically—that will enable rapid and lasting progress at the federal and international level. |

