National Wildlife Federation
36
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Tags:
national, climate change, advocacy, education, wildlife, conservation, pollution reduction, nature exploration, policy
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Larry Schweiger.
Larry Schweiger is President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Wildlife Federation. He returned to the National Wildlife Federation in March 2004 with a commitment to confront the climate crisis and to protect wildlife for our children’s future. Previously, Larry served for eight years as President and CEO of the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, where he pioneered watershed restoration and…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
21.85%
Total Revenue:
$91,587,821
From the Nonprofit
|
Tim Brady
Nov 08, 2010 |
Summary Founded in 1936 and known as “America’s conservation organization,” the National Wildlife Federation is America's largest conservation organization. The NWF works with more than 4 million members, partners and supporters in communities across the country to protect and restore… Read More. |
Contact Info
Story:
Read about what Madelin Wexler, a long time supporter for National Wildlife Federation has to say:
When asked what spawned her compassion for wildlife and its habitat, Miami Beach native Madelin Wexler immediately
credits her father’s influence. “Even when I was ten I remember my father talking about how terrible the Corps of
Engineers were to come and drain the Everglades,” she recalls. “So when he passed, I set up a fund in his name.” The
Allen Martin Everglades Fund, established in 2000, continues to support National Wildlife Federation programs today.
Ms. Wexler has also personally contributed to NWF for just shy of two decades. Her interests include the Everglades,
Florida Panthers and tropical birds and she is keenly aware of the overriding importance of NWF’s work
against global warming. To ensure the continued viability of these programs, Ms. Wexler became a member of the Rara
Avis Society, including NWF in her will.
With encouragement, Ms. Wexler shares the highlights of her life. “In the 1940’s, people thought women shouldn’t
have anything to do with journalism,” she states. Undeterred, she obtained her journalism degree from Northwestern
and climbed to editor-in-chief of an international business journal, “Hotels.” Now a retired octogenarian, Ms. Wexler is
not one to indulge herself in idle time. While she works to restore wetlands and a spring-fed stream on her NWF–certified
Backyard Habitat property in Cape Cod, she also attends school. Though her accomplishments and generosity are
inspirational, Ms. Wexler humbly concludes, “I feel like I should be doing a lot more.”
(Read about National Wildlife Federation accomplishments at: https://secure.nwf.org/about/pdfs/NWF_AR_2008_final.pdf)
Expert Reviews of National Wildlife Federation
Evidence of Impact Summary:
NWF helped pass the Energy Independence and Security Act, taking a first step in fixing our failed energy policy by raising fuel economy standards for cars and SUVs, and investing billions of dollars in clean and renewable energy sources. The Federation was instrumental in bringing the most comprehensive global warming legislation to a vote in the US Senate.Organization Strengths Summary:
Climate Change experts believe that the National Wildlife Federation has a good, strategic, and unique focus on climate change. Additionally, they have a strong presence at the community level, working with local leaders and a variety of supporters.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
At the same time, some experts believe that the National Wildlife Federation should consider different strategies to be more effective. For example, they should focus on attracting more conservatives to the movement, worry less about branding, do more public outreach, and become more active in electoral politics.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Great Focus |
|||
|
F
|
They are strategic. | ||
|
F
|
They have a great focus and integration of their efforts around climate change. | ||
|
F
|
They promote the understanding of climate change for its core constituencies (special reports for hunters and fishers in different key regions) and integrate climate change across all programs, including (and especially) environmental education and outreach. | ||
|
N
|
They have a strong focus on the climate and great outreach to new constituencies. | ||
|
N
|
They touch on unique aspect of the crisis. | ||
|
N
|
They are outstanding with their commitment to the issue from a unique perspective (wildlife/wild places). | ||
Collaboration |
|||
|
F
|
They are outstanding at organizing the environmental community and bridging divisions within community. | ||
|
N
|
This organization collaborates closely with managers and others who actually do things. | ||
|
N
|
They have excellent public education and outreach to other constituencies. | ||
|
N
|
NWF is committed to strong principles, a collaborative approach, and rallying key rural voices in favor of better policy. | ||
Reach Broad Audience |
|||
|
F
|
They drive smart field and constituent development. | ||
|
N
|
They drive dialogue on climate change and environment with a constituency normally not active on these issues. | ||
|
N
|
This organization educates and deploys the hook and bullet crowd with high impact. | ||
|
N
|
They are outstanding with their credibility; they have a long history of leading major policy initiatives and represent a politically important segment (sportsmen). | ||
Leader |
|||
|
F
|
They have the best and most aggressive leadership on the need to begin adaptation efforts for wildlife and natural resources. | ||
Strong Presence in the Community |
|||
|
R
|
They have a broad-based political constituency. | ||
|
N
|
They are deeply engaged with on-the-ground managers. | ||
|
O
|
They are a strong leader in the community; they work well with other voices. | ||
Other |
|||
|
N
|
They do bad policy analysis, but they have a huge commitment and their heart is in the right place. They repositioned the entire budget to fight the climate battle. Their top leader is a mensch. | ||
|
O
|
Jeremy Symons is superb. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Different Strategies |
|||
|
F
|
They should bring along conservatives. | ||
|
R
|
They should become more active in electoral politics. | ||
|
N
|
They should worry less about branding. | ||
|
N
|
They need to do more public outreach about their principled positions. | ||
|
O
|
They should focus more on moving conservative sportsmen groups. | ||
Leadership
Larry Schweiger
President and CEO
President and CEO
From the Nonprofit
|
Tim Brady
Nov 08, 2010 |
Summary
Founded in 1936 and known as “America’s conservation organization,” the National Wildlife Federation is America's largest conservation organization. The NWF works with more than 4 million members, partners and supporters in communities across the country to protect and restore wildlife habitat, confront global warming and connect people with nature. Perhaps best known for its award-winning children’s magazines “Ranger Rick,” Wild Animal Baby” and “Your Big Backyard” the NWF inspires a love of nature in millions of children annually. In order to be effective, the NWF utilizes a strategic plan which accepts varying attitudes and beliefs while encouraging an integrated and collaborative approach to conservation. From the Nonprofit Creation of National Wildlife Federation Theodore Roosevelt inspired a nation to conservation, but it didn’t take long for his ideals to slip. By the 1930’s ill-advised farming practices encouraged by the federal government led to the Dust Bowl. The lid had come off of the prairie and Iowa cartoonist Jay Norwood “Ding” Darling began the vision for what would become the National Wildlife Federation. A Conservationist’s Vision Ding Darling saw the impacts from the Dust Bowl first hand as an avid waterfowl hunter and he began letting people know about it. His cartoons and conservation ethic caught the attention of President Franklin D. Roosevelt who appointed him the head of the U.S. Biological Survey in 1934, the forerunner to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Aldo Leopold had just published his classic text, Game Management, and Darling was instrumental in making the service a professional agency implementing the practice of scientific management of fish and wildlife. He led the development of the Federal Duck Stamp, which is still the primary source of revenue for waterfowl management and purchased by all waterfowl hunters to this day. Since Darling illustrated that first duck stamp, the program has generated more than $750 million to purchase and lease over 5.3 million acres of wetland habitats in the U.S. Most of these lands are now protected in the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s National Wildlife Refuge System. National Wildlife Federation is Born For all the good work that Darling and others were engaged in, there was no nationwide constituency to support policies and funding for the conservation work that needed to be done. Many people cared about wildlife conservation, but nobody was organized in any fashion to advocate or influence policy decisions. In his own words, “Wildlife doesn’t vote and neither do conservationists…” Darling proclaimed, “It is hard to start a fire with one stick of wood!” He valued the importance of multiple stakeholder participation and accepting the attitudes, values, and beliefs of many groups. He dreamed of a federation promoting conservation interests, encouraging social diversity, and demanding action from Congress. Darling understood that unity was politically powerful and paramount to the success of what would become the National Wildlife Federation. In one of his most famous illustrations, Darling conjures marching crowds of advocates from Federated Rod and Gun Clubs, Soil Conservationists, Ornithologists, Mammalogists, Big Game Hunters from the West, Audubon Society, State Game and Fish Commissions, Federated Garden Clubs, Women’s Clubs, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, forestry and water experts, 4H Clubs, and other concerned citizens storming Capitol Hill en masse. Darling’s dream became reality in 1936 when he convinced President Franklin Roosevelt to invite over 2,000 hunters, anglers, and conservationists from across the country to the first North American Wildlife Conference in Washington, DC at the Mayflower hotel. Addressing the crowd, Darling stated, “Our scattered and desultory organizations—36,000 of them—have never, to my certain knowledge, influenced so much as the election of a dog catcher. . . . [With] all this potential voting strength, the wildlife conservationists together exert less influence on our governments, both state and national, than the Barrel-Rollers’ Union in Pumpkin Center…” There, the General Wildlife Federation (later changed to the National Wildlife Federation) was formed with the idea of uniting sportsmen and all outdoor and wildlife enthusiasts behind the common goal of conservation and Ding Darling became the first President of the organization. This first conference was such a success that energized and motivated participants returned home to organize federations in each of their states. These affiliates became the backbone of NWF and today, they return each year to NWF’s annual meeting, providing governance for the organization, as well as the vision and grassroots needed to achieve our joint conservation goals. Darling’s vision to unite the voices of conservationists continued as NWF was responsible for passing many laws and policies at the national level.
|


