Greenpeace
27
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: Washington, D.C.
Founded: 1971
Mission: Greenpeace's mission is to expose global environmental problems, ensure that the Earth is able to nurture life in all its diversity and promote solutions for future generations. Greenpeace, Inc. is the leading independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful direct action and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and to promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
Tags:
national, climate change, advocacy, environmental campaign, pollution reduction, business partnerships, ocean conservation, forest conservation, greenhouse gas reduction, nuclear energy, agriculture, toxic waste reduction
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Phil Radford.
Phil Radford is in a unique position as he takes the helm and builds on Greenpeace's rich legacy. Having served as Greenpeace USA's Grassroots Director for the past 6 years, he has unsurpassed experience in movement building. "Greenpeace is nothing without the people," Phil explains. "Greenpeace learned early on that we need the political power from people all over the…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
16.45%
Total Revenue:
$9,026,105
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Website:
E-Mail:
info AT wdc.greenpeace.org
Phone:
202-462-1177
Story:
Homeless polar bears in Washington DC? Hear how Greenpeace is fighting to protect polar bear:
Nothing is more emblematic of the devastating consequences of global warming than the plight of the polar bear. This is why Greenpeace worked for years with other non-profits to successfully force the U.S. government to list the polar bear as threatened, opening the door for meaningful action to protect animals most impacted by climate change. But the battle continues. Although we convinced the Department of the Interior to establish the first legal recognition that global warming threatens species with extinction, the agency undermined its own action by exempting global warming pollution and oil development from regulation under the Endangered Species Act.
Greenpeace has kept the attention on the issue as only Greenpeace can… with persistence and creativity. Our video of U.S. police arresting a polar bear protestor at the Department of Interior scored 41,000 views on YouTube. A few weeks later, Greenpeace returned to the scene to declare the Department “Critical Habitat for Oil Lobbyists.” In August, Greenpeace teamed up with artist Mark Jenkins to produce a series of street art installations featuring disheveled and dirty polar bears pushing shopping carts, picking up trash, and sitting on corners. One homeless polar bear held a three-day vigil in front of the U.S. Capitol to protest global warming on the eve of a Senate vote on offshore drilling. For two of those days, the Rolling Sunlight van stayed on site to provide free solar power and wireless access to the bear’s support crew. Other homeless polar bears were seen in Poznan, Poland trying to hitchhike to Copenhagen for the climate negotiations. A video depicting the polar bear project received 86,000 views on You Tube and generated international media attention.
(Read other Greenpeace campaigns at: http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/usa/press-center/reports4/2008-2009-annual-report.pdf)
Expert Reviews of Greenpeace
Evidence of Impact Summary:
Greenpeace successfully campaigned against Kimberly-Clark, the company that makes popular brands like Kleenex, to protect ancient forests. In February 2009, Philips announced a change in its recycling policy, taking responsibility for the cost of recycling its own products. Greenpeace has offices in more than 30 countries.Organization Strengths Summary:
Climate Change experts believe that the Greenpeace’s greatest strength is that they are willing to try many different tactics to bring important issues to the attention of mainstream society. They have also been successful in gaining traction as a powerful advocate for climate change awareness on the global stage.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
At the same time, some experts believe that Greenpeace should try to collaborate with more “mainstream” nonprofits doing similar work. They should do more campaign work at different levels (corporate, field) and make their position on particular issues clear.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Outspoken Activists |
|||
|
F
|
They are willing to try new tactics. | ||
|
R
|
It is very strident in its advocacy and continues to hold politicians' feet to the fire regarding their need to enact meaningful climate change legislation. | ||
|
R
|
They are very good at gaining media attention for specific issues. | ||
|
N
|
Climate change is a really important issue that requires we speak truth to power. Greenpeace is actually willing to do this. It may be the only nonprofit really doing this. | ||
|
N
|
They are big, take visible action, and push the envelope. | ||
|
N
|
They are hard-hitting and have high visibility. | ||
|
N
|
They get the attention that is needed -- we need an outspoken left flank. | ||
|
N
|
They have excellent media coverage. They take strong positions. | ||
|
N
|
They push from the left. | ||
|
N
|
When Greenpeace does it right, they can create an emotional response that buys them long time activism. | ||
|
O
|
They are not afraid to tell it like it is and to demand action, particularly on the international level. | ||
|
O
|
They are courageous and have clear stands. | ||
Global Reach |
|||
|
F
|
They have a broad perspective that addresses disproportionally impacted peoples. | ||
|
R
|
They have an international reach. | ||
|
R
|
They have international exposure. | ||
|
N
|
They have a global presence and a mobilizing capacity. | ||
|
N
|
They have global reach and a savvy staff, and they do not compromise on the science. | ||
Strategic |
|||
|
F
|
They are clear, strategic, and open-minded. Their focus on coal has been truly outstanding. | ||
Staff & PR |
|||
|
N
|
Greenpeace has lawyers plus the capacity for public relations. | ||
|
O
|
Greenpeace does actions that the media notice. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
More Collaboration |
|||
|
F
|
They should be more open to collaboration. | ||
|
R
|
They should work with more "mainstream" NGOs to get them to advocate for stronger protections. | ||
Better Transparency |
|||
|
F
|
They could clearly state their position and move forward with their positions without shifting around to leave people wondering where the organization is actually focused. | ||
More Campaigning |
|||
|
R
|
They are too myopic in their perspective. | ||
|
N
|
They should ramp up the action, get the message out there. They should work on some more local action to get quick results. | ||
|
N
|
They should do more field campaigning. | ||
|
N
|
They should do more corporate campaigning, focus less on policy. | ||
|
N
|
They should expand and focus their efforts against dirty energy companies. | ||
|
O
|
Recent high quality research reports combined with their advocacy work is a good direction to strengthen their influence. | ||
Leadership
Phil Radford
Executive Director
Executive Director
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

