Environmental Defense Fund
57
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Located: Washington, D.C.
Founded: 1967
Mission: Environmental Defense Fund is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including future generations. Since 1967, they have linked science, economics and law to create innovative, equitable and cost-effective solutions to society's most urgent environmental problems. Guided by science, EDF evaluates environmental problems and works to create and advocate solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-efficient and fair.
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Fred Krupp.
In his 25 years as head of Environmental Defense Fund, Fred Krupp has overseen the growth of EDF from a small nonprofit with budget of $3 million into a recognized worldwide leader in the environmental movement. Under his direction, EDF’s full-time staff has increased from 50 to 350, membership has expanded from 40,000 to more than 500,000 and new offices…
See full bio.
Financial Data
| Read Annual Report | Overhead Ratio: 19.59% |
|
Charity Navigator Rating:
|
Total Revenue: $125,425,925 |
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
| Website: | http://www.edf.org/ | Address: | 1875 Connecticut Ave NW |
| E-Mail: | Contact form | Washington, D.C. 20009, USA | |
| Phone: | 212-505-2375 | ||
| Facebook: |
|
Twitter: |
|
Story:
This is the story about how EDF helped influenced the cap put on carbon emissions.
Historians will look back to June 24, 2009, as the day the United States finally took a decisive step to control global warming. The House of Representatives voted to cap and reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions dramatically, opening the door to a better future.
Environmental Defense Fund was instrumental to the House victory, having contributed five years of scientific and economic research, expert testimony in Congress and nonstop efforts to persuade undecided House members in 40 key districts to vote yes. Eight Republicans crossed party lines to support the American Clean Energy and Security Act, all of whom EDF had contacted personally.
EDF helped build momentum for federal climate action by winning state-level victories and defending them in court. EDF also co-founded the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, an influential business-environmental alliance that provided a blueprint for legislation.
With jobs at the center of the debate, EDF mapped businesses in major manufacturing states whose employees were part of the new green economy. This helped convince legislators of the significant economic opportunities that would be unleashed by enacting a declining cap on carbon. (Source: http://www.edf.org/documents/10663_EDF_AR09_Climate.pdf)
Expert Reviews of Environmental Defense Fund
Evidence of Impact Summary:
EDF has more than 700,000 members. Its first success was banning the pesticide DDT to save great birds from extinction. EDF also partnered with private equity giant Kohlberg Kravis Roberts to improve environmental performance in its portfolio of companies. The fund joined retail leader Wal-Mart to accelerate the development of better, more affordable solar power.Organization Strengths Summary:
Climate Change experts believe that the Environmental Defense Action Fund’s greatest strength is that their experienced team produces high quality work which they have been able to communicate to the public and effectively lobby about at the national level.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
At the same time, the Environmental Defense Action Fund should do more to build a grassroots base, collaborate with other organizations, and consider broadening the reach of their work.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Good Lobbyists |
|||
|
F
|
They are clearly linked to the policy process. | ||
|
F
|
They do smart policy work and lobbying. | ||
|
F
|
They keep advocacy front and center. | ||
|
F
|
This is an excellent political operation. | ||
|
R
|
They have honest advocacy. | ||
|
N
|
They influence market players, but are more effective in their energy campaigns on the ground, e.g. Texas coal. | ||
|
N
|
They have political influence and the ability to cite past successes. | ||
|
O
|
They have effective activism for the best solutions (sometimes market based, sometimes regulatory). They are (usually) backed by sound science (as in their fisheries work). | ||
|
O
|
They have innovative and effective lobbying efforts. | ||
Good Focus |
|||
|
F
|
They are very market oriented and politically astute. | ||
|
F
|
It has a good approach and is very effective. | ||
|
R
|
As an organization it is broadly integrated in its perspectives and actions (e.g., from assisting indigenous farmers to influencing global policy). | ||
|
N
|
They have a laser-like focus on winning the climate bill. | ||
|
N
|
EDF is very focused on climate policy and enrolling key business voices in the debate. | ||
|
N
|
EDF brings expertise and focused advocacy to crucial environmental issues, such as climate change, and helps drive needed action. | ||
|
N
|
This organization highlights the economic aspects. | ||
|
O
|
They are very political and focused. | ||
Effective Communication |
|||
|
F
|
They are very savvy at communicating with federal representatives. | ||
|
F
|
They have great TV ads. | ||
|
F
|
They send good messages. | ||
|
F
|
They have strong analytics, are policy and media savvy, and are effective proponents of cap and trade. | ||
|
O
|
They are highly visible and build upon their original SOx Cap & Trade work. | ||
|
O
|
They are large and well-known. | ||
High Quality Work and Team |
|||
|
F
|
I am a member, and this organization has been featured in Forces for Good and has great management and staff. | ||
|
R
|
They combine practical solutions with legal expertise. | ||
|
R
|
They have a pragmatic approach to finding successful outcomes. | ||
|
R
|
In addition to an outstanding staff and long record of success, EDF pioneered the dominant policy instrument for addressing climate change—tradable permits—and has developed effective partnerships with the business community. | ||
|
N
|
They have a good team and credibility with businesses. | ||
|
N
|
This organization is outstanding "because the environment needs a good lawyer." | ||
|
O
|
They combine top-notch science, economics, and law. | ||
Leader |
|||
|
N
|
They have a more mainstream perception and approach, as well as good research capability. | ||
|
N
|
This is probably the leading environmental group in the country on all issues, and they are trusted. They work with business, which is important if real change is going to happen. | ||
|
N
|
They do superb research, legislation, and action on water, climate and other environmental issues. | ||
|
O
|
They are known for being an effective and powerful champion. | ||
|
O
|
It is on the front lines, making change happen. | ||
Coalition Builder |
|||
|
N
|
They have the ability to make the business case and work with businesses. | ||
|
N
|
They have a creative policy approach and an ability to create relationships between environmental and business groups. | ||
|
O
|
They develop new policy approaches and build coalitions with non-environmental partners. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Be More Inclusive and Grassroots |
|||
|
F
|
They need to become more inclusive, more grassroots. | ||
|
F
|
They should continue ramping up their lobbying activities. | ||
|
F
|
They should collaborate more with others. | ||
|
N
|
They should build a stronger grassroots framework. | ||
|
N
|
They could do more to engage their extensive base of donors in grassroots action. | ||
|
O
|
This is a one trick pony that doesn't play well with others nor use their creativity to come up with new ideas. | ||
Be Careful about Defining Success and Making Compromises |
|||
|
F
|
The organization should be mindful of the extreme urgency of action on climate change, and be careful not to compromise too much to moderates. | ||
|
N
|
They are seen by some to be too enamored of market solutions. | ||
|
N
|
They should define success based on environmental outcome not political win. | ||
|
N
|
They should lead instead of follow Democratic party policies. | ||
Consider other Kinds of Work |
|||
|
F
|
They should make sure that their advocacy work is placed in a global context. | ||
|
O
|
They are too focused on cap and trade at all costs. | ||
|
O
|
They need to address climate adaptation. | ||
Other |
|||
|
O
|
They should use their brand less often. | ||
Leadership
Fred Krupp
President
President
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

