Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
75
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Tags:
national, childhood nutrition & health, grantmaking, obesity, healthy schools, physical activity, affordable food, safe playgrounds, limit tv/video, obesity prevention
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey.
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, M.D., M.B.A., president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, is a national leader in transforming America’s health systems so people live healthier lives and receive the health care they need. A practicing physician with business credentials and hands-on experience developing national health policy, she was drawn to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation by the opportunity, as…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
n/a
Total Revenue:
$102,785,000
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Story:
Here is just a sample of one piece of research RWJF worked on around school food called “Improving Child Nutrition Policy: Insights from National USDA Study of School Food Environments, Feb 2009:”
In the United States, nearly one-third of children and teens are overweight or obese. Because children consume a significant portion of their daily calories at school, the nutritional quality of school meals and competitive foods, such as those offered in vending machines, a la carte lines and school stores, is under particular scrutiny. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) sets nutrition standards for its two major school meal programs but currently has limited authority to set nutrition standards for competitive foods. Some states and local school districts have developed their own competitive food policies, but there are no national nutrition standards that regulate all foods available to students at school.
Some key findings of the report were:
• Body mass index (BMI) data indicate that students who participated in the School Breakfast Program had a lower likelihood of overweight and obesity than non-participants.
• Only 8 percent of schools offered lunches that were consistent with the 2005 Dietary Guidelines recommendation for fiber, and no schools met the recommendation for sodium.
• While more than 90 percent of schools offered children the opportunity to select low-fat items and a low-fat school lunch, students most often chose high-fat options. (Source: http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/20090102sndapolicybrief.pdf)
Expert Reviews of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Evidence of Impact Summary:
The Robert Wood Johnson foundation is credited for its funding of several organizations and initiatives designed to improve childhood health outcomes. Beyond the range of programs funded, the attention which they have drawn is also cited as examples of impact.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
The foundation's leadership, staff, and funding are cited as its major assets. Other operations elements are occasionally mentioned by experts, as well.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
The most commonly-cited areas for improvement involved expanding programming, enhancing funding, and fostering more collaboration.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Impact |
|||
|
R
|
They provide specific research on policy and system changes that can lead to increasing healthful food choices (fruits and vegetables), decrease intake of less healthful foods (sweetened beverages, processed-packaged snacks and fast food, increases in physical activity, and decreases in sedentary behavior. | ||
|
R
|
The range of research/projects funded in the area of child nutrition/health is impressive. The means and frequency of disseminating information regarding these issues are examples of impact. | ||
|
R
|
They fund so much work that they are having significant impact. The work is scattered and too much is being spent on physical activity as opposed to food intake, but overall, they are having a wonderful impact. | ||
|
R
|
They set research priorities and funding research. | ||
|
R
|
News coverage of their work, its mentions at professional meetings, and the amount of money they are spending are examples of impact. | ||
|
R
|
In my opinion, their biggest impact has been not in the money given to projects/programs but in their use of their significant investment, respect in the non-profit and policy world, and bully pulpit to help highlight childhood obesity as a national agenda item. | ||
|
R
|
They have been a leader in the field related to funding childhood obesity research, dissemination of research findings, promoting community change, and policy advocacy. | ||
|
R
|
It is hard to leave out an organization that has allocated $500 million to fight childhood obesity. Their funding is a widespread influence on research in this domain. | ||
|
N
|
I receive weekly emails from them regarding the programs they are funding and the good changes that are being made. | ||
|
N
|
Great grant maker/funder with excellent technical assistance for local projects. Healthy Kids Healthy Communities, Fresh Fruits & Veggies grants, Walkability assessment and built environment grants are successful programs. | ||
|
N
|
They have been working in this field for numerous years. | ||
|
N
|
I know they are a funder and not a traditional nonprofit but they have had great impact on the national level. | ||
|
N
|
They have done direct work with a Project ALISA as a collaborating partner. | ||
|
N
|
They fund effective anti-obesity policy efforts, including those run by my organization. | ||
|
N
|
They fill a unique role in the field funding and disseminating research on active living (bicycling, walking, physical activity, etc.). It's something that is much-needed given the relative newness of research in physical activity. | ||
|
N
|
They are excellent at sharing information through their various digests. They have held some excellent webinars on a variety of topics. | ||
|
O
|
They provide a national network for the exchange of information and best practices among government leaders. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Leadership |
|||
|
R
|
They have very strong leadership that are widely respected in the field. | ||
|
R
|
This is a long standing organization with national leadership, and knowledgeable staff. | ||
|
N
|
Their leadership and marketing are off the charts. They have made themselves a household name to people involved in the health field at many levels (and they even sponsor some segments of NPR, which I listen to daily). | ||
|
O
|
Their leadership, Maya Rockeymoore, is strong. | ||
Finances |
|||
|
R
|
Finances are a strength. | ||
|
R
|
Finances, for sure, are strengths. They are one of the deep pockets in this realm. Their leadership, the knowledge and personal passion of Risa Lavizza-Mourey and Jim Marks, is also a strength. | ||
Funding |
|||
|
R
|
The amount of funding is a strength. | ||
Program Design |
|||
|
R
|
They have a long history of work on health issues; they have deep pockets as well as a knowledgeable and experienced staff. | ||
Awareness |
|||
|
R
|
They have a very strong reputation and long history of advocacy. | ||
Marketing |
|||
|
R
|
They produce very clear studies about policy and system change work that can provide an impact. | ||
|
N
|
They have plenty of money and very professional marketing capabilities. | ||
Staff |
|||
|
N
|
They have great staff, good marketing, and research resources to use locally. | ||
Collaboration |
|||
|
N
|
The ability of this organization to bring individuals together across agencies and cities is remarkable. | ||
|
N
|
RWJF is a smart foundation making significant investments in children's health. They provide ongoing support to grantees and help to network with others across the country to leverage assets. | ||
Communication |
|||
|
N
|
They fund local initiatives as well as national. They communicate findings of grantees on a regular basis so there everyone can learn emerging/best practices. | ||
Grant making |
|||
|
N
|
Their greatest strength is that they award large, multi-years grants, which allow for serious policy outcomes. | ||
|
N
|
They have had excellent performance in seeking out programs that would have a lasting impact on obesity and other related health issues, and then providing funding support for said organizations. | ||
Programming |
|||
|
N
|
They hold a conference each year that is well-attended by both researchers and practitioners, providing a great opportunity for cross-pollination of those doing research and those implementing programs. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Integrate Programming |
|||
|
R
|
They could think about how education can be combined with policy and system changes to have an even greater impact. | ||
Marketing |
|||
|
R
|
They could improve marketing to become an everyday name to those outside of the field of children nutrition/health. | ||
Mission Focus |
|||
|
R
|
They could focus more on food intake as opposed to activity. They should do more high impact policy work and spend less on doing community programs and more on evaluating them so at the end of the day it will be clear what works. | ||
Expand Programming |
|||
|
R
|
They shy away from dealing with obesity in very early life i.e., in utero and infancy and I think these are critical periods for the development of childhood obesity. They should start funding intervention projects in this area. | ||
Funding |
|||
|
R
|
They are not very innovative or creative as their funding tends to go to safe, traditional approaches. | ||
|
N
|
The Johnson Foundation needs to offer more grants for policy change in the obesity arena. They started funding some efforts around the country, but there do not seem to be many other funders stepping forward to fund policy change work in the obesity arena. This will be a problem for the long term survival of these fledgling policy change efforts. | ||
|
N
|
Funding of obesity policy projects seems to have dried up? I would like to see RWJF step up and resume its commitment to funding the fledgling policy programs they helped to start. | ||
Program Design |
|||
|
R
|
They are too rigid, and in my view, somewhat misdirected. They have allocated fortunes to support policy change, without funding the development of programs that are prerequisite to policies. Their mandate change without showing people how to get there from here, and you simply get frustration, and inertia. | ||
|
R
|
I think it makes sense for them to now move into how educational interventions can be combined with policy and system changes to be sure that people are aware of, and are able to use newly available resources (that is access to healthy food and options for physical activity. | ||
Impact |
|||
|
R
|
They are great at producing one project. But how scalable are these projects? The problem with research and grants is: is it cost effective? And can it be replicated? | ||
|
N
|
I am not impressed with their grant making in the obesity prevention field. They seem focused on local programs and not so focused on population based interventions. It hasn't focused at all on state level policy to impact obesity. It seems like they have a lot of money and aren't making great use of it except on an informational level. | ||
More Intervention |
|||
|
N
|
Some of their works is still assessment--I'm action-oriented and believe the problem has been assessed enough and now needs to be addressed. Some programs are action, but some are still assessment. | ||
Collaboration |
|||
|
N
|
They could use better coordination with other non-profits. They should not just 'say' that they are aligning efforts, but prove it through partnerships. | ||
Advocacy |
|||
|
N
|
They would be even more effective if they explicitly funded legislative lobbying. | ||
Leadership
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey
President and CEO
President and CEO
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.


