Texas Defender Service (Texas)
20
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Tags:
texas, death penalty, litigation, legal representation, capital crime, assistance, training and education
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Kathryn Kase.
Kathryn M. Kase has represented capital clients at trial in the state courts of Texas and New York, and has served as learned counsel in federal court. Her capital defense work has addressed the complexities of intellectual disability, mental illness, and international law. She also consults with and assists trial-level defense teams, with a special focus on teams representing Mexican…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
19.85%
Total Revenue:
$2,978,052
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Website:
E-Mail:
info AT texasdefender.org
Phone:
512-320-8300
Address:
510 S Congress Ave Ste 304
Austin, TX 78704, USA
Story:
A black man convicted of a double murder in Texas 16 years ago was at least temporarily spared from lethal injection when the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review his lawyers' claims that race played an improper role in his sentencing.
The court on Thursday halted the execution for Duane Buck, 48, two hours into a six-hour window when he could have been taken to the death chamber. Texas officials, however, did not move forward with the punishment while legal issues were pending.
Buck was sentenced to death for the fatal shootings of his ex-girlfriend and a man in her apartment in July 1995. His attorneys had asked both the Supreme Court and Texas Gov. Rick Perry to halt the execution because of a psychologist's testimony that black people were more likely to commit violence. Buck's guilt is not being questioned, but his lawyers contend the testimony unfairly influenced the jury and Buck should receive a new sentencing hearing.
The nation's highest court, without extensive comment, said it would review an appeal related to that testimony. The decision meant Perry did not have to act on a request from Buck's lawyers that the governor use his authority to issue a one-time 30-day reprieve.
Buck's case is one of six that then-Texas Attorney General John Cornyn — a political ally of Perry who is now a Republican U.S. senator — reviewed in 2000 and said needed to be reopened because of racially charged statements made during the sentencing phase. In the other five cases, new punishment hearings were held and each convict again was sentenced to die.
Expert Reviews of Texas Defender Service (Texas)
Evidence of Impact Summary:
The Texas Defender Service has been commended fo the amazing legal representation that it provides to individuals accused of capital crimes and its ability to reduce and reverse death sentences in Texas--a state that uses the death penalty more often than many others.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
According to experts, the major strengths of this organization are its dedicated and knowledgeable staff and leadership and its ability to bring together varying groups.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Experts have noted various ways in which the Texas Defender Service can improve--some of which include maintaining financial stability, seeking out more productive collaborations, and improving its internal structure.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
High-Quality Legal Representation |
|||
|
N
|
The Texas Defender Service provides tireless representation of death row inmates under very difficult circumstances, which has gradually won them a lot of admirers. They have expanded their work to seek reforms in the system that are taking root in Texas. | ||
|
N
|
Texas Defender Services has made a huge impact on the quality of death penalty litigation in Texas which is reducing death sentences statewide. Their ability to train and assist those working on capital cases is amazing. | ||
|
N
|
They provide representation to people facing execution in the nation's busiest death penalty state. Through their incredible legal and policy advocacy and public education efforts, they have reduced death sentences and executions in Texas, which is the belly of the beast. | ||
|
O
|
TDS provides excellent habeas corpus representation for indigent people in capital cases. It has also produced a number of reports critical of the fairness of capital trials, appeals, habeas corpus, and clemency proceedings which have been extremely well done and had some positive impact in a state resistant to reform. | ||
Strong Legal Talent & Dedication |
|||
|
R
|
They do the work that has to be done, under awful conditions. The legal talent at TDS is amazing. | ||
Holistic Approach to the Issue |
|||
|
O
|
TDS has a presence in training, lobbying and direct representation of death row clients. No other non-profit in Texas has this multifaceted approach. | ||
Strong Advocacy Programs |
|||
|
O
|
They have been effective at advocating for reforms in a tough political environment | ||
Reduction and Reversal of Death Sentences |
|||
|
O
|
TDS's work has resulted in the reversal of a large number of unjust and unconstitutional death sentences in Texas. Their presence has resulted in a safety net for death-sentenced prisoners in Texas: if no one else steps in to represent a man facing execution, TDS does. TDS has also improved the level of practice in Texas through training and consultation, resulting in a dramatic reduction of death sentences in Texas in the last few years. | ||
Strong Operations |
|||
|
N
|
They have outstanding leadership, vision, and breadth of service. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Great Staff and Leadership |
|||
|
N
|
The staff is committed, hard-working, and willing to look at the big picture. | ||
|
N
|
Their leadership is visionary, strategic and brilliant, and they have been able to grow significantly over the years to expand capacity and increase their impact. | ||
|
O
|
They have good leadership in Andrea Keilan and good private funding sources. They have some of the best capital litigators in the state working for them. | ||
|
O
|
TDS is terrific at bringing in new young, very capable attorneys. It also has three extremely good mitigation specialists (the critical investigators for the penalty aspect of capital cases). | ||
|
O
|
They have an outstanding, knowledgeable, and committed staff. Stable funding sources make this organization a dependable and long-term presence in the defense of justice for people facing the death penalty in the state where it is used most often. They have outstanding leadership, vision, and breadth of service. | ||
Efficient Use of Resources |
|||
|
N
|
They are strategic and smart with their resources in putting them towards the work that will most effective in reducing death sentences in the state. | ||
Important Collaborations |
|||
|
O
|
They have a unique ability to work with various groups that are not natural allies. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Higher Credibility |
|||
|
N
|
They could enhance their credibility by working within the system, rather than showing it disdain at times. | ||
Better Development |
|||
|
N
|
They struggle with development. | ||
Funding |
|||
|
R
|
They need money... | ||
Better Financial Stability |
|||
|
N
|
Their finances seem a bit shaky at times. They also could be more collaborative with their grassroots colleagues. | ||
Consistency |
|||
|
O
|
Not as good this past year as they have been in past. | ||
More Internal Organization |
|||
|
O
|
TDS suffers from weak litigation supervision at the top. It would be a far better litigation organization if it had an experienced and highly competent full-time litigation director. The capital trial consulting project could be better and would be if it directed more attention to consulting and less attention to putting on seminars. | ||
More Collaboration |
|||
|
O
|
TDS could improve its collaboration with complimentary organizations in Texas who are working towards similar goals. | ||
Increase Collaboration |
|||
|
N
|
Could improve by working cooperatively with other organizations. | ||
Leadership
Kathryn Kase
Interim Executive Director
Interim Executive Director
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

