Save the Children
27
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: Westport, CT
Founded: 1932
Mission: Save the Children is the leading independent organization creating lasting change in the lives of children in need in the United States and around the world. Recognized for our commitment to accountability, innovation and collaboration, our work takes us into the heart of communities, where we help children and families help themselves. We work with other organizations, governments, non-profits and a variety of local partners while maintaining our own independence without political agenda or religious orientation. When disaster strikes around the world, Save the Children is there to save lives with food, medical care and education and remains to help communities rebuild through long-term recovery programs. As quickly and as effectively as Save the Children responds to tsunamis and civil conflict, it works to resolve the ongoing struggles children face every day — poverty, hunger, illiteracy and disease — and replaces them with hope for the future.
Tags:
water, sanitation, hygiene, disaster response, emergencies, wells, taps, health, education, hygiene, clean water, latrines
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Carolyn Miles.
Carolyn S. Miles is President & Chief Executive Officer for Save the Children, the leading independent organization creating lasting change in the lives of more than 70 million children in need in the United States and 120 countries around the world. Carolyn became the first woman to head Save the Children in September 2011, after joining the organization in 1998…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
10.26%
Total Revenue:
$445,564,956
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Website:
E-Mail:
twebster AT savechildren.org
Phone:
203-221-4030
Story:
Save the Children has worked since Pakistan's epic 2005 earthquake to help children recover. One of the projects completed in 2009 — funded by Western Union — is providing over 3,300 girls and boys at 18 primary schools with clean water for drinking and washing hands and for latrines.
Save the Children installed wells and taps at the schools, recruited 10 students at each school to serve as health and nutrition volunteers, and trained adults to maintain the facilities.
For girls and boys in one village who drank untreated water from a stream — and for all children reached by this project — clean water means a reduced risk of illnesses and less time away from school.
In the village of Iqbal Abad, the school Parent-Teacher Council chairman, Mohammad Ikram, said the council had long wanted to give children clean water. "The children were facing problems. They were drinking water from the stream which is, of course, not clean and caused different health problems, especially stomach-related."
In Hanifabad village, teacher Mohammad Irshad said all children now regularly wash their hands. "Students demand soap from teachers and they are getting used to washing their hands after using the latrine."
When the project came in under budget, Western Union and Save the Children partnered to provide a new water pipe for the 500 poor families who live in Gijkot. The village had started the project before the earthquake, but work had not resumed and women were walking hours to collect tainted water from other sources.
Expert Reviews of Save the Children
Evidence of Impact Summary:
Most experts mentioned that Save the Children is a large, well established organization. Their main target is to serve vulnerable children, and their WASH programs at schools have been great.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
They have good access to funding and have a strong brand name. Their funding and marketing also allows them to react quickly to emergencies as well as to long-term projects. Their marketing is also very effective, in particular their donor-facing communications.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
A couple of experts mentioned that Save the Children can reduce their administrative costs and be more flexible and less bureaucratic. One expert suggested that one way to achieve both these areas is to de-centralize and allow regional offices to decide on programs.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Well Established Organization |
|||
|
N
|
I think that Save has a great program in place as a well established organization. I think they seem to have a well run group and are interested in long term sustainability. | ||
Strong Programs |
|||
|
N
|
Save the Children strives to create programs that meet the needs of the specific country and situation within which they work. | ||
|
N
|
Their impact is in their congressional briefing results. | ||
Serve Most Vulnerable Children |
|||
|
N
|
They have the mobility to serve the children who are most vulnerable - those at greatest risk. Their principal mission is to save children. They create opportunities for change through education, health, and WASH. They are dedicated to help improve schools and offer programs which will help children lead healthier lives. I have been impressed with their WASH program in schools. | ||
Strong Research |
|||
|
N
|
Save is a very big, research rich organization. Their reporting system on the impact of projects is well thought out and documented. | ||
Have Large Resources |
|||
|
N
|
I'm providing a set of general observations for these large organizations, which I have interacted with over the years on multiple continents: The shared strengths of these organizations is access to resources, strong technical expertise, and broad comprehensive programs that have the potential to create synergy when integrated together in regional initiatives. The weaknesses, and why I struggle to provide a blanket rating, is that they are so large, each country-level office almost need to be rated as it's own organization. In some countries I've been deeply impressed with their philosophy, strategies, and results, while in others extremely disappointed. Decentralization is critical for large agencies like this, especially in order to allow programs to be contextual and relevant in each region, however, the disparity in program quality suggests that a universal set of guiding principles and best practices could be applied more effectively across these organizations along with systems for accountability to ensure they are being followed. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Good Access to Funding |
|||
|
N
|
This organization has good access to funding and a good overall organizational brand name. | ||
|
N
|
They are well funded to move in large number of people to serve children. They have a good WASH program. They hare a large footprint and can work with other local organizations which can reach populations that they cannot otherwise reach. | ||
Performs Well |
|||
|
N
|
This is a well-known organization and, like UNICEF, may not be nimble in its operations and delivery, but in times of crisis, they can perform. | ||
Strong Marketing |
|||
|
N
|
Their funding and size allows them to react quickly to disaster relief as well as long term projects. Their marketing, i.e., engaging donors and telling their story is very effective. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Reduce Administrative Costs |
|||
|
R
|
They can reduce administrative costs associated with their high profile. They have a broad remit and could be more focused. | ||
|
R
|
High overhead, low impact. | ||
Improve Long Term Efforts |
|||
|
N
|
I have found their emergency efforts to be somewhat short-sighted. Their emergency staff typically have very short contracts which makes true progress difficult and institutional memory weak. Their attempts to transition from emergency to development have been strained. They made impact in the immediate emergency but their value over other organizations in the development context is weak despite their efforts to build their name in the area. | ||
|
N
|
However, WASH is subtle and the water-borne diseases are not always linked to major crisis, but day-to-day attention and solutions that do not draw media attention that seems to be good for Save the Children and the organizations mission and work. I would repeat this for UNICEF. | ||
Be More Flexible |
|||
|
N
|
They are very bureaucratic. Given their size, they have a large bureaucracy. They need to be more flexible. | ||
|
N
|
They are a big company that is not as receptive to smaller donors who may want to have an idea of how their money is used. They are very bureaucratic and sometime rules get in the way of getting the help to people. | ||
Improve on Monitor & Evaluation |
|||
|
N
|
The weaknesses, and why I struggle to provide a blanket rating, is that they are so large, each country-level office almost need to be rated as it's own organization. In some countries I've been deeply impressed with their philosophy, strategies, and results, while in others extremely disappointed. Decentralization is critical for large agencies like this, especially in order to allow programs to be contextual and relevant in each region, however, the disparity in program quality suggests that a universal set of guiding principles and best practices could be applied more effectively across these organizations along with systems for accountability to ensure they are being followed. | ||
Leadership
Carolyn Miles
President & CEO
President & CEO
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

