International Rescue Committee (IRC)
21
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Headquarters Location: New York, NY
Founded: 1933
Mission: Founded in 1933, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) is a global leader in emergency relief, rehabilitation, protection of human rights, post-conflict development, resettlement services and advocacy for those uprooted or affected by violent conflict and oppression. The IRC is a critical global network of first responders, humanitarian relief workers, healthcare providers, educators, community leaders, activists, and volunteers. Working together, we provide access to safety, sanctuary, and sustainable change for millions of people whose lives have been shattered by violence and oppression. The IRC is on the ground in 42 countries, providing emergency relief, relocating refugees, and rebuilding lives in the wake of disaster.
Tags:
emergency response, humanitarian assistance, relief, disaster response, refugees, children and youth, health care, women, governance and protection of rights, economic recovery, advocacy, human trafficking, asylees, water and sanitation
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
George Rupp.
George Rupp has been president of the International Rescue Committee since July 2002. As the IRC’s chief executive officer, Dr. Rupp oversees the agency’s relief and development operations in over 40 countries and its refugee resettlement and assistance programs throughout the United States. In addition, he leads the IRC’s advocacy efforts in Washington, Geneva, Brussels and other capitals on behalf…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
8.68%
Total Revenue:
$317,301,472
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.
Contact Info
Story:
The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst crises and helps people to survive and rebuild their lives. For over 75 years, we have offered lifesaving care and life-changing help to refugees forced to flee from conflict or disaster. At work today in over 40 countries and in 22 U.S. cities, the IRC leads the way from harm to home.In 2010, the IRC restored hope and opportunity for millions of conflict-affected people around the world. Here’s a look at some of our recent achievements:
- We gave over 4.4 million people access to clean drinking water and sanitation.
- Our doctors, nurses and community health workers served nearly 14.5 million people with primary and reproductive health care. We vaccinated 210,000 children for measles and other childhood diseases and our IRC-supported clinics and hospitals helped 152,000 women deliver healthy babies.
- We trained over 6,000 educators and supported 2,300 schools attended by 373,000 children, over half of them girls. We provided and supported skills training for over 11,500 young people while nearly 12,000 children participated in IRC sponsored child-friendly spaces and children’s clubs.
- We counseled and cared for nearly 12,000 survivors of sexual violence and educated and mobilized over 2.5 million men, women and children to lead prevention efforts in their communities.
- We assisted over 17,200 refugees who departed from camps and cities in East Asia to enter the United States and build new lives.
- In the United States, we helped resettle some 9,600 newly arrived refugees and provided services to over 24,500 refugees, asylees, and victims of human trafficking.
Expert Reviews of International Rescue Committee (IRC)
Evidence of Impact Summary:
The International Rescue Committee does high quality, evidence-based work in geographic areas where others will not. They have a track record of strong programming, particularly with with schools in refugee and internally displaced persons (IDP) settings.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
Experts speak highly of IRC's comprehensive approach to emergency response, which includes a broad scope of programs, covers a wide geographical area, and delves into policy and resettlement work. They also remarked on IRC's strong leadership, good advocacy, technical capacity, and excellent understanding of the on-the-ground situation.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Experts believe that the International Rescue Committee needs to become more comfortable with its recent explosion in size, perhaps improving integration among its programs, and/or reevaluating their emergency response capabilities. They could also focus more on their programs dealing with the transition to development.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Focused Programs |
|||
|
N
|
They have a track record of strong programming. | ||
|
O
|
Their work shows excellent results with schools in refugee and internally displaced persons (IDP) settings (i.e. their work with Afghan refugees in Pakistan for Afghan refugees). | ||
|
N
|
Their work has focused quality and involves policy engagement with a focus on women. | ||
High Quality Work |
|||
|
N
|
It's clear that they have evaluated their work and are constantly looking for ways to improve programming in this area. They are considered a leader in the sector. | ||
|
O
|
They use health improvement indicators, immunization rates, nutrition assessment, educational assessment etc. to measure impact. | ||
|
O
|
They have a solid evidence-based approach to interventions. | ||
|
N
|
They are notable for high quality work. They have a willingness to work in geographic areas where others will not. | ||
Comprehensive Approach |
|||
|
N
|
Their work encompasses diverse sectors and they work both in emergency and development sectors (which makes them better at both). | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Established Programs & Technical Capacity |
|||
|
N
|
Some of their country programs are very strong. They have several excellent technical departments. | ||
|
R
|
They have excellent technical capacity. They have a broad scope of programs. | ||
|
N
|
They have a strong grounding in history of refugee and internally displaced persons (IDP) issues and very strong sexual and gender-based violence protection programs. They have an excellent, motivated technical staff. | ||
Strong Leadership |
|||
|
O
|
They have strong leadership under George Rupp. They have a strong field presence from Haiti to Somalia (by remote management). They have excellent think-tank work being done by Gerald Martone. | ||
|
R
|
They have strong leadership and a great staff. They have acumen in advocacy in Washington, Geneva and elsewhere and an ability to bring highly visible political and media figures to lend their time and expertise to raising the visibility of refugee and related humanitarian issues. They possess a willingness to innovate in programs and financing. Their work is gender sensitive as well as concerned with both protection and assistance to beneficiaries. They have expertise in broad range of sectors. | ||
|
O
|
They have strong leadership. They take a flexible, adaptive approach. They are consistently strong and professional contribution. They have selected areas of technical expertise and collaborate well with other professional humanitarian agencies. | ||
|
N
|
They have good leadership. Their work is based on sectoral expertise and focus. | ||
Good Advocacy |
|||
|
N
|
They are strong in the area of advocacy with the US Congress. They have their "ears to the ground," i.e. a good understanding of what the situation is on the ground in relief contexts. | ||
Comprehensive Work |
|||
|
O
|
They do outstanding policy work (e.g. on role of military versus humanitarian actors) and US resettlement work of refugees in addition to work in over 40 countries with displaced people. | ||
|
O
|
They deploy to many of the most resource restricted countries, and cover many different areas of need to respond to large scale disasters. | ||
Innovative and Creative Approaches |
|||
|
O
|
They pursue innovation and creative approaches to issues related to governance and confidence-building in conflict environments. | ||
Excellent Coordination |
|||
|
N
|
They coordinate well with other NGOs, the UN, and local governments. They have a growing advocacy voice which is based on smart, evidence-based surveys in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo. | ||
|
N
|
They are excellent at coordination and collaboration with peer organizations. | ||
Wide Support Base & Long History |
|||
|
R
|
They have a wide support base and a long history. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Effectively Use Size |
|||
|
N
|
They need to deal with the negative effects of having grown significantly in size. | ||
|
O
|
They need to learn how to work as a large organization. While their size allows great flexibility, it also limits their approaches to scale. They need to continue to seek innovation and be nimble to organizationally adapt to the increased uncertainty and vulnerability. | ||
Improve Staff Conditions |
|||
|
O
|
They should improve conditions of service for staff. | ||
Develop Programs |
|||
|
N
|
They could improve evaluation of the impact of protection programs, something that many organizations struggle with. | ||
|
R
|
They should develop their programs dealing with the transition to development (post-conflict and post-disaster), which are not as focused as those operated by development organizations. | ||
Increase Integration |
|||
|
O
|
They could improve integration of departments (harmonization between US resettlement and international programs for example). | ||
|
N
|
They should consider integrating other programs into current endeavors. | ||
Widen Support Base |
|||
|
N
|
They should widen their public support base to work in countries where there is less institutional donor funding. | ||
Strengthen Emergency Response Capabilities |
|||
|
N
|
They should build stronger links to disaster risk reduction. | ||
|
R
|
They need to reevaluate their emergency response capabilities, given vastly expanded needs. | ||
Leadership
George Rupp
CEO and President
CEO and President
From the Nonprofit
The nonprofit has not added any comments yet. If you are a representative of this nonprofit and would like to leave a comment, please email us at
feedback@myphilanthropedia.org
with your request.

