Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
54
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Tags:
bay area, climate change, research, advocacy, policy, clean air, water, wildlife, urban living, environmental health, oil development, energy conservation, pesticide use
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Frances Beinecke.
Under Frances's leadership, the organization sharply focuses on curbing global warming, developing a clean energy future, reviving the world's oceans, saving endangered wild places, stemming the tide of toxic chemicals and accelerating the greening of China. With Bob Deans, Frances recently co-authored the book Clean Energy Common Sense: An American Call to Action on Global Climate Change, which shows how…
See full bio.
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
16.80%
Total Revenue:
$107,999,911
From the Nonprofit
|
Patrick Kiely
Nov 03, 2010 |
Meeting the Climate Challenge in Time At NRDC, tackling climate change is both an urgent and long-term institutional priority. Since NRDC’s founding in 1970, we have built up an unparalleled team of expert advocates focusing on the most significant opportunities… Read More. |
Contact Info
Story:
This is a review of the NRDC by a monthly donor and someone self-described as having “incorporated environmental practices in his own life and encouraged others to do the same.”
The NRDC is an organization that is a positive and effective voice in environmental policy. They have a great website where they keep you updated on government issues dealing with the environment. You can send messages to your representatives through their site. It's very easy, and from looking at results, also has an impact. They also have plenty of information on how to improve your own personal environmental choices and how to get involved in your community. They are highly rated by organizations such as Charity Navigator, so if you donate, you know your money is being spent correctly. I've seen the results of this organization how it makes complex government issues easier to understand, being a true advocate for change in environmental policy, and bringing a variety of ideas to the table on how to better our world both on a personal level and as a whole. What I've enjoyed the most about my experience with this nonprofit is how easy it is to stay on top of environmental news and how easy it is to get involved and donate. The communications I have received from the NRDC have been organized, intelligent, and have inspired me to act. I would like to see this organization continue its great work in protecting our environment and advocating change in destructive policies which harm every living being. (Source: http://greatnonprofits.org/reviews/natural-resources-defense-council-inc)
Expert Reviews of Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Evidence of Impact Summary:
NRDC have been the lead analyst and advocate on all the appliance standards that have been approved in CA. The new TV efficiency standard will cut new TV energy use by up to 50%, which is the most stringent standard in the world. The NRDC was influential in passing important legislative bills (AB 32, SB 375). They also helped decouple California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
Above all, experts praise NRDC for their outstanding leader and extremely competent staff. They are able to effectively collaborate, lobby, push policy, and work locally and nationally. In addition, their work is scientifically based, further adding to their credibility and reputation in the sector.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Some experts believe that NRDC has lost their way as a leader because they have compromised too frequently when it comes to supporting federal climate legislation. Additionally, some experts believe NRDC should do more to be collaborative, focus more on environmental justice issues, and diversify their funding sources.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Impact |
|||
|
F
|
The Natural Resources Defense Council is by far the most effective advocate for clean energy and climate policy in the Bay Area. NRDC was instrumental in passing AB 32 and has taken a leadership role in defending the policy from aggressive attacks. NRDC's efforts were also essential to passing California laws and policies that have or will result in substantial emissions reductions, including the nation's first power plant greenhouse gas performance standard and a "loading order" that prioritizes energy efficiency above all other electricity resource options. | ||
|
F
|
NRDC really is the go-to group on SB375 and they provide technical capacity to the climate movement. | ||
|
F
|
Natural Resources Defense Council has a lot of input on policy making, in California and nationally. | ||
|
R
|
The NRDC has had a long lasting and effective impact on energy strategies including utility regulatory reform to decouple income from sales and rewards for energy efficiency. They were also one of the earliest groups to bring focus on climate change and to provide cogent information. They helped in the litigation of the Pavley Bill. | ||
|
R
|
The Natural Resources Defense Council is an advocate on energy efficiency and on designing of decoupling regulations for PUC/CEC. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC played a key role in passing California's Global Warming Solutions Act, AB 32 and they also played a key role in successfully advocating for efficiency standards. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC helped the passage of SB 375. | ||
|
N
|
The NRDC's efficiency center has been the lead analyst and advocate on all the appliance standards that have been approved in California, which is significant because California is the world leader whose standards are then exported to the national level and often worldwide. One recent example is California's approval of the TV efficiency standard which was the most stringent in the world, that will cut new TV energy use by up to 50 percent. The immediate benefits from the standard include: annual electricity savings of just under $1 billion, elimination of the need to build a large 500 MW power plant, and prevention of three million tons of CO2/yr. Establishing standards for other products have had similar impact. In addition, the NRDC efficiency center has been the leader in promoting utility regulations that encourage investment in energy efficiency. California's leadership in this area, particularly PG&E, is a direct result of these efforts. NRDC is also a leader in spreading this to other states and utilities. | ||
|
N
|
The NRDC worked on passing both AB 32 and SB 375. They are a strong national climate effort including research and visual communications. | ||
|
N
|
The Natural Resources Defense Council is widely respected for their work and very active at both the state and national level. | ||
|
N
|
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a strong and effective advocate on global warming policies in the state legislature and at the California Air Resources Board. They have built a strong coalition of business leaders supporting strong global warming policy. | ||
|
N
|
Natural Resources Defense Council works to ensure that protection of public health is not lost in the Cap and Trade policies being developed. | ||
|
O
|
NRDC has been a leader in organizing and participating in the Climate Plan coalition that has had an influence on the Strategic Growth Council's development of grant guidelines for Prop 84 to direct the funding to infill/compact development outcomes on the ground. These grant guidelines are likely to be more far-reaching and influence other state discretionary spending in the future as well as leverage other funding. Secondly, NRDC has been a leader for the passage of AB 32, SB 375, and other bills. PSA's and other outreach to build a base of support for changing land use patterns to reduce emissions and improve quality of life, independence from foreign oil. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Outstanding Leadership and Staff |
|||
|
F
|
Ralph Cavanagh is the single most effective energy/environmental advocate in the state, period. The organization also boasts a remarkably high staff retention rate, which is in part a product of its strong track record of success in achieving significant policy victories. | ||
|
F
|
They have very strong staff. | ||
|
R
|
Ralph Cavanagh is one of the most effective advocates anywhere. The NRDC also has strong leadership in CA and the western region. Their staff are seasoned, knowledgeable experts. | ||
|
R
|
They have very strong leadership (Ralph Cavanagh) combined with an incredible depth on the bench. They have an excellent mix of legal/regulatory people with engineers. | ||
|
R
|
This group has the best technical and legal resources with several dozen or more staff in San Francisco alone working on climate policies, including branching out from core issues - smart growth, EE, carbon pricing to others - health, water, lands/biomass, etc. The group is well connected and has some muscle. | ||
|
N
|
They have strong staff in terms of science, law, and policy. | ||
|
N
|
They have extremely competent staff, effective collaboration and partnerships, and are strong at lobbying. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC employs the renowned leaders in the field: Ralph Cavanagh for utility EE programs, Noah Horwitz and David Goldstein on appliances. The organization is also well run, reporting and operations are smooth and best-in-class. | ||
|
N
|
Their greatest strength is the deep expertise of their staff. | ||
|
N
|
They have expert staff, an understanding of state and national global warming policy issues, and strong engagement in the legislative arena. | ||
Well Rounded in their Work |
|||
|
F
|
Their staff is ambidextrous. They can do the technical work, write well, and inform the advocacy community. | ||
Great Reputation |
|||
|
N
|
They have vertically integrated leadership, i.e. strong policy/legislative/communications at many levels. They have a high level of respect among elected officials. | ||
|
N
|
They have a national reach and successes. | ||
Scientifically Based Work |
|||
|
N
|
They have well respected staff and a policy agenda that is scientifically based. | ||
Successful at Fundraising and Marketing |
|||
|
O
|
NRDC is very professionally run and therefore a credible organization to attract major private funding. In addition, they do not shy from retaining superior marketing research and PR firms. | ||
Beginning to Build Local Involvement |
|||
|
O
|
NRDC seems to be understanding that they can take a leadership role in the kinds of new collaborations necessary to make change happen on the ground in California. This "teamwork" and leadership needs to be encouraged. As a very sophisticated organization, NRDC can educate and build strong and broad coalitions needed for change. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Better Leadership and Staffing |
|||
|
F
|
NRDC's programs appear to act largely independently, which presents challenges when a multi-disciplinary approach is required (such as to address climate policy). The organization could benefit from more top-down leadership to ensure that its program areas are as coordinated as possible. | ||
|
F
|
They are understaffed on climate and transportation issues. | ||
Collaborate More |
|||
|
F
|
They could be more collaborative in California. | ||
|
O
|
NRDC has a tendency to be less than collaborative and to get out in front of other like minded interest groups. The formation of the Climate Plan is an example of improvement. This is likely because they are more professionally administered and better funded. But, that also puts them in a unique position to collaborate and build the base of support. | ||
More Outreach Outside California |
|||
|
R
|
Perhaps the place where I would like to see NRDC's energy group do more is in outreach beyond California. | ||
Other |
|||
|
N
|
They should focus more on cross media issues to avoid pollution shifting and avoiding situations where the perfect becomes the enemy of the good. | ||
|
N
|
Overall we owe great thanks to NRDC. However, its partnerships with corporations are so tight that the organization risks being co-opted. Example: Its support for Waxman-Markey with giveaways of 85% of emission allocations to polluters. | ||
Diversify Funding Sources |
|||
|
N
|
They have done a great job engaging their key funders, but could use focused effort to diversify their funding. They get some funds from NRDC members, but a few other major donors may help them. | ||
Focus on Social Equity and Environmental Justice |
|||
|
N
|
They should even more clearly prioritize social equity impacts and have a bigger Bay Area focus. | ||
|
N
|
They could use more engagement with the environmental justice community. | ||
Compromise Less - Lead More |
|||
|
N
|
NRDC has lost its way. The organization is essentially a mouthpiece for the entrenched political interests. They are no longer able to lead, but rather have become an impediment to the type of change we need - often as described by the Center for Biological Diversity. | ||
|
N
|
They should stop compromising! | ||
|
N
|
NRDC and other large national organizations continue to support federal climate legislation that provides emissions reductions far below what the science requires and that actually moves us in the wrong direction by exempting greenhouse gas from most Clean Air Act programs. NRDC's advocacy would be greatly improved if they demanded policies that are in line with what the science requires, and focused more on changing the existing "political reality" rather than advocating for what is "realistic" given current politics. | ||
|
N
|
They are too caught up in the "in-the-beltway" mentality. They need to be a leader in pushing Congress to do what's right, not just what's politically expedient. | ||
|
N
|
NRDC is a major player in the climate world, but has compromised too much with the industry to be taken seriously within the community. I value their work abroad, their E2 campaign, and their many legal campaigns, but when it comes to climate lobbying, I think they play a harmful role by compromising too quickly. | ||
Leadership
Frances Beinecke
President
President
From the Nonprofit
|
Patrick Kiely
Nov 03, 2010 |
Meeting the Climate Challenge in Time
At NRDC, tackling climate change is both an urgent and long-term institutional priority. Since NRDC’s founding in 1970, we have built up an unparalleled team of expert advocates focusing on the most significant opportunities and policy venues for advancing clean energy solutions and reducing the pollution that endangers our health and climate. When it comes to climate change, our challenge is to “bend the curve” in time. We must accelerate the progress underway at the state, regional and federal level and internationally, if we are to reduce emissions fast enough to avoid locking ourselves and future generations into a dangerously disrupted climate. While we have suffered some disappointing setbacks in 2010, especially in the U.S. Senate, the environmental community and our growing ranks of allies must continue to press forward on multiple fronts to build the foundation for a truly low-carbon and cleaner energy economy, and ensure that it grows at a pace that results in the emission reductions that are needed. Much of this work will take place outside of Washington, at the local, state and regional level, and in key developing countries, such as China, where it is critical to build the market and regulatory infrastructure needed to steer economic growth toward cleaner energy resources. As we look ahead to next year and the coming decade, it is helpful to take stock of what we have achieved and are well positioned to build on. These accomplishments, of course, were collaborative efforts involving the hard work of multiple organizations, many of whom are recognized on this website. Key accomplishments include:
The World Resources Institute has analyzed the emission reduction potential under existing federal authority, including the Clean Air Act, and previously announced state actions. While the analysis shows that it is feasible to achieve a 12% reduction by 2020, it does not take into consideration additional state and federal policies (the impacts from utility decoupling, for example) that could result in even greater reductions. Moving forward, NRDC will be focused on two overarching goals: accelerating investment in efficiency and low-carbon energy sources, and improving the political environment that has limited progress towards comprehensive solutions at the federal and international level. Through legal and policy advocacy at the state and federal level, our priority objectives are to: 1.Advance, defend and enforce pollution-reducing standards under current law—for greenhouse gas emissions, as well as conventional pollutants—and clean up or replace dirty power plants and industrial sources with cleaner technologies; 2.Reform electric and gas utility markets to make investments in energy efficiency and clean energy resources a more profitable alternative to high emission and resource intensive power generation; 3.Ensure that state and regional programs to limit greenhouse gas emissions become good working models for transitioning to a clean energy economy while lowering energy bills and creating high quality jobs; and, 4.Pursue select opportunities at the federal level to establish performance-based standards and incentives to accelerate deployment of efficient, low-carbon technologies in the transportation, power and industrial sectors. Success on these fronts will help ensure we have the advanced technologies and regulatory tools in place to get the U.S. on track in the near term. In the longer term, however, we will need national legislation to establish the broad market conditions that will accelerate the deployment of these technologies at the scale and pace that are needed to achieve our emission reduction goals. It is imperative therefore that we use each and every near-term opportunity to improve the political conditions—privately and publically—that will enable rapid and lasting progress at the federal and international level. |


