Union of Concerned Scientists
56
"Up" is the number of experts who agree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in the
field. "Down" is the number of experts who disagree that the nonprofit has had the most impact in field.
Tags:
bay area, climate change, research, advocacy, global warming, clean vehicles, clean energy, nuclear power, invasive species, food, agriculture, global security, 2010
Summary
Stories
Expert Reviews
Leadership
From the Nonprofit
Leadership
Kevin Knobloch.
Kevin Knobloch brings 32 years of experience in public policy, government, advocacy and media to his job as leader of Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). He is knowledgeable about a range of environmental and national security issues, including global warming, natural resource and clean energy economics, renewable and efficient vehicle technologies, nuclear weapons, forest management and corporate responsibility, as well…
See full bio.
Transparency Information
This organization has earned the GuideStar Exchange Seal, demonstrating its commitment to transparency
(learn more)
Financial Data
Overhead Ratio:
14.28%
Total Revenue:
$32,242,490
From the Nonprofit
|
Lynn Pallotta
Membership Manager Oct 21, 2010 |
The Union of Concerned Scientists seeks to apply the best available science to better understand the multifaceted challenges facing us, their potential solutions, and the complicated choices and trade-offs among policy pathways. We seek to identify and eliminate systemic obstacles…
Read More.
|
Contact Info
Story:
Founded in 1969, UCS was born out of a teach-in organized by a group of scientists and students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to protest the militarization of scientific research and promote science in the public interest.
The gathering took place during the height of the Vietnam War—in the same year Cleveland's heavily polluted Cuyahoga River caught fire. Appalled by how the U.S. government was misusing science, UCS founders drafted a statement calling for scientific research to be directed away from military technologies to solving pressing environmental and social problems. To that end, UCS initially focused the spotlight on defense-related research, nuclear weapons, and nuclear power.
Over the past four decades UCS has broadened its focus to encompass other critical science-related issues, including climate change, energy, transportation, sustainable agriculture, and scientific integrity in the federal government. Over that time UCS' influence on the public debate has grown. (Source: http://www.ucsusa.org/about/ucs-history-over-40-years.html)
Expert Reviews of Union of Concerned Scientists
Evidence of Impact Summary:
UCS helped craft and pass AB 32. They succeeded in pressuring the CA Public Utilities Commission to approve the largest solar energy program in US history. And, in the 1990s, UCS helped convince California to require SUVs and light trucks to meet the same tailpipe emission standards as cars. Eventually they won higher fuel economy standards, expanding the use of clean, renewable electricity by passing renewable standards in 26 states.See expert comments.
Organization Strengths Summary:
UCS has built up a strong reputation because so much of their work is scientifically based. They have great leaders, work very well in coalitions, keep costs low, and have been effective at marketing their information in an understandable way for all audiences.See expert comments.
Areas for Improvement Summary:
Some experts believe UCS would be more effective if they were better at translating and marketing their high quality, scientifically based research to the public and communities. They should also focus more on at the grassroots level and try to collaborate more at the local level. It seems they have had trouble building and keeping sufficient staff members, so there's room for improvement in that category as well.See expert comments.
Expert Comments: Evidence of Impact
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Impact |
|||
|
F
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists is very engaged in both AB 32 and the Western Climate Initiative policy conversations, and consistently advances thoughtful, nuanced policy analysis. Its transportation and energy experts are among the best in the nonprofit sector, and its outreach staff has a strong track record of creatively mobilizing the organization's activist members. | ||
|
R
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists has solid technical credentials and provides a wealth of educational and advocacy materials on a broad range of climate related topics. Their staff are polished and effective in their advocacy. They are great at translating technical details for public consumption. | ||
|
R
|
They lobby state and national policy-makers and offer scientists a way to connect. I've volunteered with their organization, received press training, and gone to Sacramento with them. They are very strategic and in many cases effective. The benefits of working in climate change policy is that the potential successes are huge, but can take a long time. As a scientists, I really value their work as it strives to be based on the best science. | ||
|
R
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists was involved in the crafting and passage of the California Global Warming Solutions Act. | ||
|
N
|
Union of Concerned Scientists is one of the premier voices on leading early-adopter policy in California. They have effectively made significant change happen locally and served as a resource for the national and global policy arena. | ||
|
N
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists helped prepare the first California Climate Impact Assessment, which was subsequently revised and was very influential in the adoption of AB 32. | ||
|
N
|
Union of Concerned Scientists has had an impact on federal and state policy on energy and climate change. They have policy expertise, are politically savvy, and are a good coalition member. | ||
|
N
|
Union of Concerned Scientists has rallied the scientific community in strong support of key California Air Resources Board (CARB) AB 32 regulations like the low carbon fuel standard, and was a strong advocate in support of cleaner vehicles and fuels at CARB and the California Legislature. | ||
|
N
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists are the go-to organization for deep understanding of renewable policy, and are highly influential in Sacramento, working principally on renewable energy standard policies. | ||
|
N
|
UCS has played a key role in promoting fuel efficiency in vehicles. | ||
|
N
|
UCS has worked to increase the efficiency of diesel trucks. | ||
|
N
|
They have been a lead advocate for the network of grantees promoting the California Clean Cars Initiative which has now become the defacto national standard. These rules will save nearly 800 MtC02 by 2030, and California's leadership has been crucial for this. | ||
|
N
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists have strong policy work to impact fuels and vehicles. They have successfully passed low carbon fuel standards and increase fuel efficiency in California. | ||
Expert Comments: Organization Strengths
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Keep Costs Low |
|||
|
F
|
UCS has a lower salary structure than comparable nonprofits and maintains very low travel expenses, which makes them an excellent value from a philanthropic perspective (it also raises challenges). Its staff is almost without exception diligent and deeply committed to addressing climate change. | ||
Works Well in Coalitions |
|||
|
R
|
UCS also works very effectively within coalitions, sharing the workload, stepping up and back as needed and working to maintain as unified a voice as possible within the advocacy community. | ||
|
R
|
UCS has incredible technical expertise that they share freely and work so well with coalitions. They're good at bringing complex issues to the lay person and working with diverse constituents, including a lot of time in the San Joaquin Valley. They are well respected! | ||
|
N
|
They play very well with other groups in the space, and have been a leader in making sure collaboration happens. | ||
Effective Materials and Marketing |
|||
|
R
|
They have national media experience. | ||
|
N
|
They have excellent materials (online and other) and are well known. | ||
Great Leadership |
|||
|
R
|
They have a great staff, political knowledge, and persistence. Also, they have excellent information on their website and understandable policy reviews. | ||
|
N
|
They have a great collegial atmosphere, excellent leadership, and are talented at fundraising. | ||
|
N
|
Laura Wisland is highly intelligent, and has a deep understanding of policy. | ||
|
N
|
UCS has done great work on the climate denial issue--and some of their staff, particularly Alden Meyer, are leading opinion leaders in the climate policy spectrum. | ||
Scientifically Based Work Leads to Strong Reputation |
|||
|
N
|
Their staff is smart, credible and competent - it is no small feat working in this dynamic, complex policy arena. The organization is well-respected. My perception is they have a strong grassroots reach, as well. | ||
|
N
|
Their work is based on strong science. | ||
|
N
|
They have well respected staff and a policy agenda that is scientifically based. | ||
|
N
|
They have strong California campaign staff and have legitimacy because of their scientists. | ||
|
N
|
Their science orientation gives them much authority and provides a strong scientific basis for others. | ||
Strong Voice in the Policy Debate |
|||
|
N
|
A major strength of this organization is its staff, from CEO to state level people. Another major strength is its constituency and spokespersons - scientists - who bring a critical voice into the policy debate. I feel that their leadership has done an excellent job of positioning them politically. They take strong policy positions, and are willing to say when a proposed policy or bill is not strong enough to do the job and they work to make it better. At the same time, they understand that political change is usually incremental and they are not paralyzed by the gap between the policy that is needed and the policy that is achievable. | ||
Connected Locally and Nationally |
|||
|
N
|
They have knowledgeable staff and a state and national presence. They have the ability to track global warming policies at the state and national level and understand the interaction between the two. | ||
Expert Comments: Areas for Improvement
Select the boxes to display the results according to expert type.
Show:
Show:
X
Foundation Professionals (F)
X
Researchers and Faculty (R)
X
Nonprofit Senior Staff (N)
X
Other (consultants, journalists, policy makers) (O)
Focus on Adding More Staff and Retaining Them |
|||
|
F
|
The comparatively low salary structure can pose a challenge in recruiting and retaining high-quality expert staff, which is reflected in the staff turnover rates (which are about average for a nonprofit of its size). The Berkeley office also operates as a satellite office, and its coordination with Cambridge headquarters on state vs. national policy priorities could perhaps be improved. | ||
|
N
|
They could use more staff at the state and grassroots level. | ||
|
N
|
They need more people working for them. | ||
|
N
|
They need more staff. | ||
Stay True to Science Focus |
|||
|
F
|
They have been advocating for 450 ppm, when scientists have shown that we need 350 ppm to avoid climate catastrophe. UCS should not be playing politics, and instead should be a clear voice for the best available science. | ||
|
N
|
The Union of Concerned Scientists and other large national organizations continue to support federal climate legislation that provides emissions reductions far below what the science requires and that actually moves us in the wrong direction by exempting greenhouse gas from most Clean Air Act programs. UCS's advocacy would be greatly improved if they demanded policies that are in line with what the science requires, and focused more on changing the existing "political reality" rather than advocating for what is "realistic" given current politics. | ||
Work on Coalition Building |
|||
|
R
|
They need to develop more local collaboration. | ||
|
N
|
They should focus more on coalition building with other nontraditional organizations interested in climate change. | ||
Become More Effective at Marketing their High Quality Information |
|||
|
R
|
I'd like to see them write some more reports focused on the science and making it clear to the public (and policymakers). I think their reports might be another 'unbiased' source that the public can rely on. | ||
|
N
|
They could magnify their message/reports - they are a credible source of climate science and policy analysis. More people should be listening/have access to what they say. | ||
|
N
|
I think UCS could be more visible and perhaps get more traction out of the excellent reports they produce. | ||
|
N
|
They have great analysts, scientists, and advocates, but these folks could use some media and fundraising training. | ||
|
N
|
They should expand their capacity to translating science to swing districts. | ||
Have More Local Impact |
|||
|
N
|
They should do more work specific to the Bay Area. They should include a more holistic version of the transportation impacts that includes reduced vehicle use, not just efficient fuels and cars. | ||
Leadership
Kevin Knobloch
President
President
From the Nonprofit
|
Lynn Pallotta
Membership Manager Oct 21, 2010 |
The Union of Concerned Scientists seeks to apply the best available science to better understand the multifaceted challenges facing us, their potential solutions, and the complicated choices and trade-offs among policy pathways. We seek to identify and eliminate systemic obstacles to the progress we need, and address emerging dangers in ways that connect with people’s lives—thus building support for strong and decisive action.
Specifically, we will: • Expand our work safeguarding the integrity of science in federal policy making to encompass inappropriate corporate influence on government science • Prioritize phasing out conventional coal-fired power plants to improve human health and reduce global warming emissions • Clean up smog-forming pollution and global warming emissions from big-rig trucks and dirty fuels • Apply our scientific expertise to better understand the complex challenges of sustainable land use in the agriculture, forestry, energy, and conservation sectors, and promote choices that will protect our water resources, climate, and the long-term health of our agricultural soils • Underscore the growing risks of nuclear terrorism, as well as the urgency of reducing stockpiles of nuclear weapons We will amplify our work by engaging and expanding our networks of scientists, engineers, economists, and other experts, and bolster our relationships and engagement with the public health and medical communities. We will provide our staff with the tools they need to communicate more effectively with decision makers and the public. And, we will provide our members and supporters—the lifeblood of our organization—with the means to become more knowledgeable about our work and make meaningful contributions toward achieving our mission. The UCS approach combines independent science, practical solutions, compelling communications, effective engagement, and persuasive advocacy to achieve our goals. We have for more than forty years advanced innovative solutions to some of the greatest challenges facing humankind. We are deeply grateful for the support of members who make this work possible as we all work toward a healthier and safer planet. |


